Plextor PlexTools

Author

G@M3FR3@K
Senior Moderator
Article posted 03 Sep 02 14:07

New Features

 

On the previous page we already saw that the PlexTools version can give you a lot of information on your Plextor drive and besides that we already briefly mentioned some of the advanced settings you can enable or disable in the ‘Drive Settings’ screen:

PlexTools - Drive Settings

The ‘Disc Velocity’ options aren’t that interesting since these settings were already present in the previous PlexTools versions. Below that we can see some more interesting settings in the ‘Advanced Settings’ screen. Most options are pretty self-explaining but some options are new. Please note that some options are greyed out in the screenshot above since these options are intended for the new Plextor PX-W4824A and PX-W4824TU drives which we currently do not have yet.

  • Disable PoweRec:
    When you disable PoweRec the 48X Plextor drive will not optimise the burn speed for the used media and will burn all discs at the maximum speed of 48X. Of course, when your media cannot handle these speeds, write errors can occur so it’s not recommended to use this option unless you’re sure your media can handle 48X.

PlexTools Information

The ‘Enable DMA’, ‘Enable Single Session’ and ‘Hide CD-R Media’ options could already be found in previous PlexTools versions but the ‘SpeedRead’ option is new:

  • Enable SpeedRead:
    If you’ve read our
    announcement on the upcoming Plextor drive you will have noticed that it, by default, will be set to 40X reading and not to its maximum read speed of 48X. With this ‘Enabled SpeedRead’ option you can set the Plextor 48X drive to its maximum read speed:

PlexTools Information

Some people have already asked the question why Plextor did this. They’re asking why the drive is not limited when it comes to writing at 48X. Well this is because reading at 48X is not the same as 48X:

“…Even though it would seem logical to expect the same maximum speed for reading and writing, and if not equal to expect a higher read speed, this is not always the case for Plextor recorders. The reason for this comes from the different characteristics of the media that is typically used in both cases.

Writing is usually performed on brand-new, blank media, with virtually no surface print or labels attached, still free from scratches, probably inserted in a CD drive for the very first time and mastered with very high precision.

In the case of reading, the inserted disc is often a completely different type: there is a good chance that it is a stamped disc, maybe mastered with lower quality, less precision, poorer tolerances and greater eccentricity. It may have heavy or unequal surface printing or attached labels. Maybe it has been used in many drives before what may have introduced fingerprints, scratches or small damage to the inner hub.

Spinning such discs at high speed may introduce vibration, irritating noise, or even read errors that will cause the drive to spin down. Even worse, the micro-cracks caused by certain drives’ clamping mechanisms could grow in an avalanche-like way under influence of temperature, pressure and high rotation speed, causing the disc to scatter or “explode” in many pieces. Additionally, thorough tests have shown that a large increase of rotational speed will reduce the lifetime of the spindle motor by 25% while at the same time the internal drive temperature will rise, which will affect the stable operation of all components. The effects of a continuous spin at high speed for reading are much worse than the limited time (<3 minutes) it takes to write a disc at this speed…”

So there you have it: the reason why Plextor has limited the read speed of their new recorder by default. When you enable the SpeedRead option the drive will be able to reach 48X with stamped and recorded CD’s only. When reading audio discs the speed will still be limited to 40X reading because audio discs have poorer error correction and will suffer too many read errors. This applies to CD-RW media as well because of the different characteristics, like lower reflectivity.

As a final precaution, the tray- and drive bezel of the Plextor PX-W4824A have been partially redesigned and reinforced to prevent any particles of an exploding disc escaping from the drive.

More New Features:

So far some of the ’smaller’ new features found in this new PlexTools version. As you will have understand the new features mentioned above were intended for the latest Plextor PX-W4824A and PX-W4824TU drives but now for some new features you can use with every Plextor drive. In short the biggest changes in this new PlexTools version are support for freedb and a special ‘DAE Error Recovery’ system.

freedb is a database to look up CD information using the internet. This is done by a client (a freedb aware application) which calculates a (nearly) unique disc ID for a CD in your CD-ROM and then queries the database. As a result, the client displays the artist, CD-title, tracklist and some additional information. The information can then be displayed in the PlexTools Audio CD Player or, more interesting, the text can be burned as CD-Text when you burn an audio CD using the PlexTools software.

And besides freedb support the PlexTools software now offers some advanced options to correct errors occurring during the extraction of scratched or dirty audio discs. When extracting the audio data it will be corrected for possible errors ensuring that the extracted audio is of perfect quality. On the next page we’ve done some tests with this new feature to see if the PlexTools software can indeed extract a scratched audio disc.


11 Comments

TBZ
Posts: 125
Posted on: 03 Sep 02 16:24
Quote:
As you can see from the table the PlexTools software showed some excellent results and the program could decrease the amount of errors in track two with 67%!
I'm sorry I must of skimmed passed this somewhere in your article. How did you arrive at this figure? And also, do you think PT is better at DAE than EAC now?
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Sep 02 17:31
Very nice. But a question Why binary comparison did was made with Plextor utility? why with only one track, probabily different from the tree of preceding comparison?
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Sep 02 18:25
TBZ: Mode 1: Track 2 - 500.613 errors Mode 5: Track 2 - 162.028 errors A decrease of 67%. Unfortunately EAC doesn't have a detailed LOG-file with all the errors so we can't compare both programs here and that's why we did a binary comparison. pippocalo: we did some more tests and got the same result: EAC extracted damaged audio tracks that were different from the original file. PlexTools created the exact same files regardless if the track was damaged or not. It's very hard to tell the quality otherwise so we did a binary comparison. Yes we used a utility developed by Plextor but that doesn't make a difference in the achieved results.
Pio2001
Posts: 370
Posted on: 03 Sep 02 20:00
I'd like to know the ripping speed with clean CDs. EAC is often slow in secure mode.
Mastakilla
Posts: 465
Posted on: 03 Sep 02 20:01
hmz very strange EAC didnt do better in the binary comparison... did EAC actually said there were problems with extracting? or did it just say everything was ok? and have u noticed any hearable difference once? cause i dont think that 1000 bytes are hearable... would love to see a reaction from the creators of eac on this one
Pio2001
Posts: 370
Posted on: 03 Sep 02 20:20
As I understood, there were no errors reported. However, 1032 bytes are 258 samples, that is at most 258 errors, at least 43. Unfortunately we don't know the number of errors detected during EAC's rip. Keep in mind that errors are erratic : look at the EAC logs, in low, track 1 has no errors while track 3 has, while in medium, it is the opposite. It is possible that the Plextor success and EAC failure are within the same uncertainty, and can be reversed in another rip. More tests must be conducted. I can send you some killer CDs for error recovery : bad CDRs that always make EAC report no error while there are (on my Memorex-Teac-Sony drives)
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 05 Sep 02 09:20
Maybe they should retry the EAC test, but WITHOUT using C2, I don't think C2 is reliable on new plextors.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 05 Sep 02 17:54
For more results confirming our test results please check out this thread on our Plextor forum.
SatCP
Posts: 13
Posted on: 05 Sep 02 19:08
I've been very close to the development of the new PlexTools software, so let me shred some light on it... First let me say the audio extraction engine is completely renewed. Earlier versions of PlexTools don't even come close to the new PlexTools version when it comes to extraction quality. Pio2001:
Quote:
I'd like to know the ripping speed with clean CDs. EAC is often slow in secure mode.
On an undamaged CD the extraction speed will be equal or very close to that of regular burst extraction software (AudioGrabber, CDex,...). In other words, as fast as possible.
Quote:
It is possible that the Plextor success and EAC failure are within the same uncertainty, and can be reversed in another rip. More tests must be conducted.
I've done extensive tests of which I cannot publish the results (but when I have more time to get a new site online, I'll redo 'em). The conclusion is: the new PlexTools is superior to EAC. This thanks to the use of burst extraction mode to read data and C2 information to detect errors. When an error occurs PlexTools can choose from 5 different extraction schemes, ranked from normal to extreme secure. Let's say that scheme 5 is selected. Because of the C2 information PlexTools knows exactly which samples (not just sectors!) are correct and which are not. PlexTools will then recover the correct samples whereas EAC may not find enough matching sectors to restore the original data. sikkek:
Quote:
Maybe they should retry the EAC test, but WITHOUT using C2, I don't think C2 is reliable on new plextors.
Au contraire! In fact, the C2 error detection of the newer Plextor drives is so reliable that the whole error detection/correction mechanism is built around it. And the numbers don't lie... Older plextor drives (8/4/32 for example) have a rather unreliable C2 error detection. These drives will not benefit from this software. The new PlexTools will only work reliable when the C2 information is reliable. Drives with no or non-reliable C2 error detection will still get the best results with EAC. Of course, at the price of a much lower extraction speed.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 05 Sep 02 19:32
Thank you for your input SatCP!
alan1476
Posts: 17234
Posted on: 21 Nov 08 18:19
This is great software. Its easy and the final product is great, if you want to put movies on your IPOD, this is the program to do it with.

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.