Harvard Law professor Charles Nesson is tired of the Record Industry Association of America (RIAA)’s lawsuits, and will help to make a change while defending a Boston University graduate student who stands accused of copyright infringement.
The main argument Nesson will use is that the Digital Theft Deterrence and Copyright Damages Improvement Act of 1999 cannot be used by the RIAA to seek monetary damages because it’s designed for criminal law, and shouldn’t be used for civil enforcement.
The act in question calls for damages of $750 to $30,000 for each individual copyright infringement charge, and a fine up to $150,000 for willful copyright violations.
Nesson will help defend Joel Tenenbaum, who is accused of sharing 816 copyrighted music tracks through the Kazaa peer-to-peer file sharing network in 2004. Tenebaum offered to settle the case for $500 out of court, but the RIAA refused and is instead demanding $12,000 in monetary compensation.
A federal judge requested Nesson’s office defend Tenenbaum, who was one of several dozen alleged file sharers who showed up to court without legal representation.
RIAA officials said pre-litigation notices are a legitimate and fair response to online piracy, which exploded after being introduced by Napster.
The RIAA has sent out more than 30,000 pre-litigation letters and John Doe lawsuits against alleged file sharers — sometimes accusing people who don’t own computers, or even, in the most extreme cases, people who are deceased.
"The RIAA is a body that has no political accountability, that can pursue any defendant it chooses at its own whim, that can accept or reject payoffs in exchange for not prosecuting the cases, and that pockets for itself all payoffs and fines … a significant percentage of these fines are never contested, regardless of whether they had merit, because the individuals being fined have limited financial resources and little idea whether they can prevail in front of an objective judicial body," Nesson said in a statement.
The majority of the 30,000 elect to settle out of court typically for $3,000 to $5,000, with fines up to $8,000.
Just one person who received a pre-litigation letter choose to take the RIAA to court, where the monetary fines and legal fees often increase dramatically.
2 Comments
If people want to share, I would recommend getting a proxy server that doesn't log your activity. Get a premium Usenet account with SSL encryption so your ISP has no freaking clue what you are downloading (most content can be found on Usenet anyways and usually there first before going to torrent sites). I mean, you about have to nowadays.
Most popular headlines
PSGroove PS3 jailbreak hack now runs off smartphones (1)
- Tue 7 Sep 00:00 by wconeybeer
- Game Consoles, Mobile Phones
If you have the right smartphone, you may not need to purchase any special equipment to use the PSGroove jailbreak exploit on your Sony PS3. A rework known as PSFreedom has been created to allow homebrew enthusiasts with certain Linux-based phones to run the code necessary to unlock their console.
PSJailbreak PS3 mod ban permanent, while free solution is unveiled (4)
- Fri 3 Sep 21:04 by wconeybeer
- Game Consoles, Piracy
An Australian court has make a decision today to permanently uphold their temporary ban on the PS3 PS Jailbreak USB modchip dongle just as a new free solution, PS Groove, has hit the internet with instructions and step-by-step instructional videos going viral.
PSGroove released: Open Source PS3 hack, PSJailbreak competitor (1)
- Wed 1 Sep 19:09 by Randomus
- Game Consoles
Sony PlayStation 3 owners now have yet another jailbreak to choose from when looking to unlock their game console, as the open source PSGroove PSJailbreak has been released.
Sony blocks PS3 USB hack exploits with new firmware update (1)
- Tue 7 Sep 16:00 by wconeybeer
- Game Consoles
Everyone knew that it was only a matter of time before Sony pushed out a new firmware update to block the exploit that allowed the PSJailbreak and PSGroove hacks to function. Apparently, that time has arrived.

