Pioneer develops 400GB 16 layer disc

07 Jul 08 15:40 by DoMiN8ToR in category Uncategorized To news archive

Pioneer developed a Blu-ray disc compatible disc that can hold 400GB of data on 16 layers. The company for now only has a read-only disc available but expects that it will also be able to produce recordable discs. Each of the layers can hold 25 GB of data, the equivalent of one singel Blu-ray disc layer.

Multi layer discs exist for a while. Normal DVD players and burners are usually able to read and write to dual layer discs and also with the introduction of Blu-ray there was a lot of talk about multiple layers straight away.

It has been a challenge for Pioneer to get a clear signal from each of the recording layer of the disc, in such a way that the data was read straight from one layer with no distortion of data from other layers. Pioneer invented a disc structure that can reduce crosstalk from adjacent layers, resulting in a 16-layer optical disc that can playback high-quality signals from every layer. 

Pioneer achieved stability in the playback of recorded signals by employing a wide-range spherical aberration compensator and light-receiving element that can read out weak signals at a high signal-to-noise ratio in the optical pick-up mechanism. Since the optical specifications of the objective lens, such as the distance from the lens to the disc, are the same as those for the current Blu-ray discs, it is possible to maintain compatibility between the new 16-layer optical disc and the Blu-ray discs.

As usual with these kind of technologies, no data on availability and pricing has been given.

15 Comments

DukeNukem
Posts: 1003
Posted on: 07 Jul 08 17:45
That's a lot of pr0n.
johnnyjt
Posts: 68
Posted on: 07 Jul 08 17:45
Oh My Will wonders never cease! JohnnyJT :X South Philly
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 07 Jul 08 21:33
Now fill thaqt up full of MP3's
SciFer
Posts: 193
Posted on: 08 Jul 08 02:13
GO TEAM BLU-RAY!!! Just had to do it :X
BitRate
Posts: 411
Posted on: 08 Jul 08 02:27
I wonder how reliable such a disc would be ? If one gets a scratch on it you can kiss all your pr0n goodbye
CPUSlayer
Posts: 103
Posted on: 08 Jul 08 03:02
Wonder how long long that would take to fill and burn at 2 speed! :r
Witchdoctor6969
Posts: 30
Posted on: 08 Jul 08 05:08
Something tells me that with 16 layers, you might be very lucky to get single speed avaraged across the entire disk.... :r
Chuckwagon
Posts: 163
Posted on: 08 Jul 08 07:14
16 layers? It'll be a while before they have a recordable one available. And you can bet it'll be pricey. And once you've coastered a few I bet the neato factor will drop off fast.
Cubeman42
Posts: 86
Posted on: 08 Jul 08 18:16
getting closer to a usable size... maybe we might see 1TB. Then I might start getting happy.
DukeNukem
Posts: 1003
Posted on: 08 Jul 08 20:00
I'm guessing you'll need to buy new hardware, too. Damn.
shaolin007
Posts: 883
Posted on: 09 Jul 08 01:34
Well, I feel like kicking a** and chewing bubble gum but I am all out of gum.
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 09 Jul 08 08:33
Duke, not according to the article "Since the optical specifications of the objective lens, such as the distance from the lens to the disc, are the same as those for the current Blu-ray discs, it is possible to maintain compatibility between the new 16-layer optical disc and the Blu-ray discs."
old3eyes
Posts: 96
Posted on: 09 Jul 08 10:05
Would you want to archive your preciouse data to one of these? A 1TB HD will be far cheaper, quicker and reliable..
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 09 Jul 08 15:12
Why on earth would anyone want to backup their precious data to something like an optical disk is beyond me. Yes, I have done so in the past, maybe 5 years ago I was still burning data to DVD. Now ? I use hard-disks. Safer, cheaper, quicker, and generally just better. I don't know anyone with a blu-ray burner, as the cost per gigabyte is just stupid - you'd have to have more money than sense to waste your money on optical junk. I could never truly trust my data coming off an dvd / or any other optical format.
4x5Photo
Posts: 9
Posted on: 16 Jul 08 07:12
LOL, what a wothless announcment. They cant even get the regular Blu Ray discs to sell on the storage side of the market, like this thing is gonna change anything, lol. People still arent even using Dual Layered DVD9's because of the high prices of the discs compared to the single layered discs. Single layered DVD's account for over 98% of all storage DVD's sold. if people were that hard up for additional storage space they would have moved to DVD9's and again they havent. People are more concerened with cost per GB more then they are with size and people are 100% content to use SL DVD's. The only people who will use Blu Ray storage are people in certain creative fields and some people who have too much money and nothing worthwhile to do with it. Blu Ray on the movie side at least will obtain niche status and make a llittle bit of money. Blu ray on the storage side is going to be an utter failure.

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.

Most popular headlines

Grandmother is falsely accused of file-sharing (11)

A woman falsely accused of downloading copyrighted movies might've lost her Internet connection had she not taken her case to the media.

PS3 closing ground on Xbox 360 (1)

  • Sat 6 Feb 14:00 by Randomus
  • Game Consoles

After years of trailing the Nintendo Wii and Microsoft Xbox 360 on the sales charts, the Sony PlayStation 3 continues to close the gap on the Xbox 360.

Blame Blu-ray for lack of PS3 game downloads (14)

Don't expect Sony to offer its full game catalog for download over the Playstation 3 any time soon.

Murdoch: Avatar DVD won't be 3D (17)

  • Thu 4 Feb 00:00 by Randomus
  • Blu-Ray writers & players, LCD TV

News Corp. CEO Robert Murdoch confirmed the DVD release of Avatar won't have 3D support, with no word on a possible 3D Blu-ray version.

See all headlines

Active Commenters