Pop stars demand more control over their music

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.
07 Oct 08 16:31 by Seán Byrne in category Uncategorized To news archive

Up until recent years, the only way music was sold to consumers was by physical media such as records, tapes and CDs.  The more music sold, the more the recording industry made, which in-turn should mean more income for the artists.  Now with music being widely distributed online as downloads and clips for ringtones, it would seem that this couldn’t be a better time for the artists.  However, going by this article, it turns out that while the record industry is exploiting more ways to sell and deliver music, the artists end up being left with a very small slice of the sales, even though online distribution eliminates the cost of media replication, running retail stores and shipping.

Now several of Britain’s top pop and rock artists including Robbie Williams, Radiohead and Kate Nash are demanding more control over their music.  They have teamed up to launch an organisation called the Featured Artists’ Coalition to protect the interests of performers and music artists.  The aim is to have artists retain the ownership of the copyright of their music, which they would then lease out to their label. 

With digital media providing a growing number of ways to sell and use music, the coalition also asks the music industry to explain to its artists how, where and why their music is used as well as to get the artists a larger share of the sales.  The coalition will be there to help artists young & old, regardless of how well known they are.  So far, some artists fed up with the major record labels have decided to bypass the labels altogether and directly release music online through their websites and social networking sites.

6 Comments

CDan
Posts: 3463
Posted on: 07 Oct 08 19:58
The big question that artists should be asking is why, with digital distribution, do they need a "record company" at all? I'm sure the record companies are scared sh*tless of what the answer to that question might be.
DukeNukem
Posts: 998
Posted on: 07 Oct 08 21:01
I think they should get more money from their music. I mean, where else are they going to get the coin for that third olympic swimming pool in California or that rare copy of erotic stories from 1658? Whatever. Just think how normal Britney would be if she wasn't worth $50 million. Poverty keeps you grounded, people. I'm so grounded, it isn't even funny.
vikampion
Posts: 160
Posted on: 07 Oct 08 23:54
I agree with this in that music artists shouldn't be ripped off by the record companies. Glad to see the consumers aren't the only ones feeling the pain from the Greedy RIAA.

@CDan, granted, record companies are pretty pointless. But the main reason they exist is advertising. Music artists should only be focused on their music, and playing shows. The record companies "should" be there to take care of distribution and advertising the music.

Somewhere along the line, someone had the bright idea of giving the record companies full control over the music...lol, I guess that person was a genius.
CJF1983
Posts: 80
Posted on: 08 Oct 08 00:13
Poverty is an understatement for me so I know how it feels Duke as for this article I don't feel bad in the least bit for the rich as they live above and beyond their means and have no sense of what it's like to have to live in a budget. But no one should get ripped off at all including consumers.
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 08 Oct 08 01:51
C'mon guys! If you're accessing the net you can't be that poor!

You're forgetting that there are other artists than Britney that are not living a luxurious pampered lifestyle, because they sell fewer CDs or because they aren't as popular, the label gives them less royalties. They do deserve more money, and those big names deserve faaaaarrrrrr far less.
CJF1983
Posts: 80
Posted on: 08 Oct 08 04:33
I must respond to your claim that you believe and I quote "You're forgetting that there are other artists than Britney that are not living a luxurious pampered lifestyle" Which artists are you talking about? wannabe's on American Idol?? I am confused here did I miss something?

Post a comment

Most popular headlines

Repeat UK file sharers to be banned (2)

  • Wednesday 28 October 22:56 by Randomus
  • Piracy

Internet users in the United Kingdom accused of illegally sharing copyrighted music and movie files will face stiff penalties, starting with warning letters that will lead to bandwidth restrictions, according to media reports from the UK.

Nintendo to launch larger screen DSi

  • Wednesday 28 October 01:35 by Randomus
  • Game Consoles

Nintendo is expected to launch a new DSi hand-held gaming device in Japan that has a larger screen, as the company tries to increase sales in the hand-held gaming market it once dominated.

T-Mobile offers no contract phone plan

  • Tuesday 27 October 22:46 by Randomus
  • Mobile Phones

In an effort to better compete with Verizon Wireless and AT&T, T-Mobile has introduced new no-contract wireless plans that include unlimited voice services.

2 new Roku boxes launched for Netflix & more

Roku's streaming set-top set-top boxes now come in three flavors, adding new features as well.

See all headlines

Active Commenters