RIAA angers federal judge in file sharing case

19 Dec 08 13:27 by Randomus in category Uncategorized To news archive

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) reportedly broke a court order after a federal judge told the RIAA specifically not to do something they were caught trying to do anyway.

As the Motown Records vs. John Doe legal case — a case involving Motown, Universal Music and BMG against students at the University of Southern California — heats up, the RIAA was given permission by District Court Judge Manuel Real to subpoena USC to receive names of students accused of file sharing. 

The ruling told the RIAA that all collected information is "to be used for the sole purpose of obtaining injunctive relief pursuant to the complaint filed herein protecting plaintiff’s right under the Copyright Act."  In Layman’s terms, the RIAA can help build its case against the file sharers, not try and negotiate settlements with them — which reportedly is exactly what the RIAA is doing.

After filing John Doe suits against alleged file sharers, the RIAA attempts to avoid costly trials, instead seeking anywhere from $2,000 up to $8,000 — or more — as settlement money.

Judge Real has not issued a statement indicating what will happen to the RIAA for ignoring part of his ruling.  Universities believe turning over student information to the RIAA or other industry groups may violate the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.

Similar posts:

6 Comments

andyman210
Posts: 47
Posted on: 19 Dec 08 18:20
The judge should rule that the RIAA has no case as they tried to circumvent his order. Plantiffs should be found not guilty with prejudice (can be used against RIAA in future cases) and subject to costs
dentman42
Posts: 648
Posted on: 19 Dec 08 19:20
Plus the RIAA should face a stiff fine and their involved personnel should face jail time for contempt of court.
Chuckwagon
Posts: 163
Posted on: 19 Dec 08 21:53
It would seem, based on their actions, that the RIAA isn't really interested in protecting the copyrights, but more in generating revenue. Therefore, if I were the judge, I would rule that the RIAA had acted in bad faith and they must therefore in the future show that a suspected copyright infringement had caused loss, infringement wihtout loss would no longer warrant a civil remedy, and any awards would be limited to actual losses.

If you are serious about protecting a copyright, so be it, protect it. But to play these games shows that they only really care about adding money to the coffers and don't want to take a chance on losing a ruling in court, which makes me wonder how strong their cases are. Maybe they are worried they'll get a jury trial one day and the jury will say "You want thousands of dollars for some songs this person downloaded that they could easily have recorded for free off the radio? That's ludicrous, go pound sand!" And then they wouldn't be able to brow beat others into big cash settlements. Weenies.
Blu-rayFreak
Posts: 435
Posted on: 19 Dec 08 23:06
I hope the judge throws out all of the RIAA cases due to their insubordination
Crabbyappleton
Posts: 5757
Posted on: 19 Dec 08 23:31
The RIAA has decided to stop suing individuals this week as it has proven ineffective and has become a public relations nightmare. They instead have cut deals with as yet un-named ISP's that will forward warnings to customers, hobbling their connections and finally cutting off their account if they continue. The ISPs are cooperating as many are working with music services anyway as partners.
Quema34
Posts: 3208
Posted on: 20 Dec 08 06:36
AFAIK, the "John Doe" lawsuits are illegal as hell, since the only time any kind of lawsuit similar to this is ever allowed is when someone desires to acquire a piece of land and it's impossible to determine from public record if there are any heirs to the land, hence the **** vs. 'The Unknown Heirs of so-and-so." It's been proven time and again the RIAA scoffs at rules of Civil Procedure of any kind and thumbs its nose at the law. If a regular Joe Blow plaintiff tried filing a lawsuit in such sloppy manners, each and every one would be thrown out without delay nor question.

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.

Most popular headlines

Microsoft: PS3's Blu-ray is a burden (4)

  • Thu 18 Mar 00:00 by JaredNewman
  • Blu-Ray writers & players, Game Consoles

Microsoft's Xbox product director Aaron Greenberg said the Xbox 360's lack of a Blu-ray player has actually been crucial to the console's success.

Sony's new ad mocks Wii, Xbox 360 (3)

  • Sat 20 Mar 10:02 by Randomus
  • Game Consoles

A week after publicly unveiling its PlayStation 3 Move motion controller at GDC, Sony has launch a new ad attacking the Microsoft Xbox 360 and Nintendo Wii game consoles.

Spain allows P2P, link-sharing of copyrighted works (10)

As long as no profits are made, it's legal to share copyrighted material through peer-to-peer transfers or link to it through a Web site, a Spanish court ruled.

Sony considers discontinuing the PSP Go (4)

  • Thu 18 Mar 02:00 by Randomus
  • Game Consoles

It's possible Sony will pull the plug on its struggling PSP Go mobile gaming unit, as it has become obvious the company dropped the ball a bit in the mobile gaming business.

See all headlines

Active Commenters