RIAA to revive John Doe lawsuits

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.
01 Apr 09 00:00 by Jared Newman in category Uncategorized To news archive

Not satisfied with the current approach in its war with music piracy, the Recording Industry Association of America will resume the practice of suing individual file sharers, CDFreaks has learned from a credible industry source.

Last year, the RIAA said it would stop filing new lawsuits and focus on other strategies, but the source said bad PR over a possible "three strikes and you’re out" program with Internet service providers has negated any benefits the RIAA might have gleaned from the new policy. The association has previously insisted that they were pushing for a "graduated response" program that doesn’t necessarily mean hard-and-fast terminations of Internet access, but those claims often fell upon deaf ears.

"They figured, ‘Why bother? We’re getting a bad rap anyway,’" our source said, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. "The old way’s just easier, and more lucrative too, I might add."

The source said the RIAA will likely seek steeper penalties than before. Where the association sought roughly $150,000 per song in the famous Jammie Thomas case, they might be seeking closer to $500,000 per song for similar cases.

Another source who is familiar with the RIAA’s operations expressed a bit of wistful nostalgia for the old days. "Back then, they could just sue whomever they wanted," the source said. "Copyright violation is a serious crime, and no one should be exempt from the law, be it the old, young or terminally ill." An RIAA spokeswoman did not confirm — or deny — the story.

Ongoing efforts to negotiate a three-strikes policy with ISPs will be abandoned, the source said. Representatives from several ISPs were not available for comment, with the exception of a Verizon spokesman, who simply said "Good," and offered no further explanation on the record.

Our source said that new lawsuits will be filed starting today.

Update: As some of you have guessed, this article was part of our annual April Fools joke, which CDFreaks has a long history of participating in. We certainly hope that the RIAA does not revert back to extorting/suing individuals and we are sorry if this article upset you. Happy April Fools day!

24 Comments

debro
Posts: 11446
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 01:33
Oooh!
Guess who's going down the tubes

Now with fast internet in most countries, loss-less codecs & the huge number of legal digital distribution channels ... musicians can just employ their own marketters, record their junk at an independant recording studio & clean up.

The RIAA is a dinosaur stuck in a tar-pit. Just give it up & go extinct already.
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 01:35
I can take my laptop and travel the area and find an open link to the internet. I will , WILL, download the latest and greatest tunes on that link. Over and over the same tunes to as many open ports that I can find. The people/businesses will not be harmed. The only ones that will pay will be the RIAA..... HA, HA.

Why do not all do the same thing. Download at any open port. Over and over again. Even if you do not like the music. Pick the music that the RIAA will sue....

If 10% of the downloaders would do this there is no way that anyone can prove that anyone can be sued.
shaolin007
Posts: 883
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 01:57
I am still wondering how they get $150k or even $500k from 1 song?? If I walked in a store and stole a whole CD of the shelf and I got caught later with it, would the RIAA sue me for $150k-500k for each song on the CD that I stole from the store?
DM85
Posts: 110
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 02:19
An example of law not catching up to the internet age.. an abuse of the system.
debro
Posts: 11446
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 02:24
My guess is that they assume that 500,000 people that would actually pay for their crap songs, but didn't

Now this begs the question ... how do they figure out how many people actually would have bought that particular song, and have they subtracted the qty of actual buyers ..

And then ongoing, how many people have they sued for that particular song for $500,000?
And if another (or even more) person(s) is/are sued for that particular song, does the RIAA provided a proportional refund for the previous victims of their ongoing lawsuits?
Zod
Posts: 438
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 02:58
It seemed to me that the courts were getting closer and closer to ruling against how the RIAA sues people, and there severe lack of evidence. I figured thats way there were tring to go for the 3 strikes your out isp rule (which wouldn't work, because any isp that didn't jump on board would have a huge advantage). So now they're back to suing people. Wouldn't it only be a matter of time before judges continue down the path that RIAA lacks sufficient evidence to sue you in the first place?
Dustmite
Posts: 33
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 03:48
As always, head over to www.riaaradar.com to see if the artist you're downloading it part of the RIAA. Independent artist? Buy the CD. Part of "The Man"? Download that shit!
debro
Posts: 11446
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 03:51
Is this an April Fools joke?
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 05:18
This about the days it was posted!!!!
chsbiking
Posts: 543
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 06:20
That would be my guess.
debro
Posts: 11446
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 06:23
It's not actually funny then .. ISP's aren't co-operating anyway, so it's actually inevitable, unless the RIAA goes bankrupt in the near future ...which we can only hope.
Wesociety
Posts: 5230
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 07:31
Most of their witch hunts don't make it to court, they scare the accused into settling out of court, whether guilty or not.
bstrayman
Posts: 40
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 10:09
A REPUTABLE news source would never run an April Fool's joke purporting to be news. If this is a joke, GROW UP CDFreaks!
debro
Posts: 11446
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 10:19
Lol! betcha 1/2 a dollar

But if this is a joke .. it's totally lame, because it'll be true in a few weeks anyway
Zzyzxroad
Posts: 145
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 12:10
mrooowr. Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed? If you want such seriousness, go to cnn or cnbc. Lighten up.

I saw it a mile away (April Fools) but didnt want to spoil the rant for others who forgot about it.
chsbiking
Posts: 543
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 12:29
Well I don't know if this is or isn't. We'll find out eventually.

Now this isn't funny? Ha! That's nothing, if I remember correctly one year the joke was the gov and RIAA had siezed the cdfreaks.com servers and was logging everyone's IPs. Now that wasn't funny. I just don't remember for sure if it was this site though lol. Think it was.
steveo119
Posts: 291
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 13:19
cdfreaks do an april fools every year dont they? this is the only thread i can see that is up today, so this must be it!!
Liggy
Posts: 6441
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 13:34
I hardly know any reputable news source that does NOT have an April Fool's joke.
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 15:05
haha the picture and too many anonymous.... got fooled!
oh there is P0RN forum just above the hi-def forum.... it said "for senior members who like to bang-bang"... I saw Tax post there but I can't get in!!!
ivid
Posts: 386
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 15:25
Are you kidding ?
ivid
Posts: 386
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 15:26
Love the commie pic
Hemispasm
Posts: 5248
Posted on: 01 Apr 09 15:33
No reputable site has april fools jokes? Lol, even CNN went down the road of sin i guess...

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/04/01/tech.viruses/index.html
Circlestrafe
Posts: 57
Posted on: 04 Apr 09 20:29
If I buy a song, and it sucks, can I sue the RIAA for allowing 500,000 people to be unnecessarily tortured? Or what if I buy and album, and half the songs are garbage? Why can't I sue the RIAA?

Metallica allows a whole entire 30 second audio clip on Rhapsody for all their tunes unless you buy. What if from 31 seconds to the end of the song is shit? Who do I sue for ripping me off, Metallica or the RIAA, or both?

Idiots, 'illegal' file sharing promotes sales. Otherwise BETA, VHS, Cassette tapes, DAT, CD-R, DVD-R, and all others in between would've bankrupted the Entertainment Industry a LONG time ago. Wake the hell up.
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 05 Apr 09 21:44
Now that's some funny sh1t right there!

Post a comment

Most popular headlines

Repeat UK file sharers to be banned (2)

  • Wednesday 28 October 22:56 by Randomus
  • Piracy

Internet users in the United Kingdom accused of illegally sharing copyrighted music and movie files will face stiff penalties, starting with warning letters that will lead to bandwidth restrictions, according to media reports from the UK.

Nintendo to launch larger screen DSi

  • Wednesday 28 October 01:35 by Randomus
  • Game Consoles

Nintendo is expected to launch a new DSi hand-held gaming device in Japan that has a larger screen, as the company tries to increase sales in the hand-held gaming market it once dominated.

T-Mobile offers no contract phone plan

  • Tuesday 27 October 22:46 by Randomus
  • Mobile Phones

In an effort to better compete with Verizon Wireless and AT&T, T-Mobile has introduced new no-contract wireless plans that include unlimited voice services.

2 new Roku boxes launched for Netflix & more

Roku's streaming set-top set-top boxes now come in three flavors, adding new features as well.

See all headlines

Active Commenters