Radiohead supports P2P file sharing

06 Apr 09 15:26 by Randomus in category Uncategorized To news archive

As the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and Joel Tenenbaum continue a legal battle in the court room, Tenenbaum’s legal team, consisting of Harvard law professor Charles Nesson and several students, have a new star witness.

That new witness is Radiohead manager Brian Message, who will testify on Tenenbaum’s behalf during the trial.  Specifically, Message will discuss the idea that file sharing has the ability to help the music industry, and that there are both pros and cons to the new technology.

"He is leading a wonderful group of U.K. artists who are coming out in favor of the idea of non-commercial sharing among music fans," Nesson said in regards to Message.  "It’s clear that one of the issues that’s at play in the case is this idea that there’s been tremendous damage done to the music business.  While there may have been some damage done to the CD business, the music business is going to be saved by readjusting and developing these exciting new business models that are consistent with a digital environment."


One of Radiohead’s most recent record releases, In Rainbows, was available as freeware — pay as much as you want to — digital download, with more than 1.75 million copes sold of the release.

High profile bands have chosen sides in the battle against P2P and music sharing in general, with Radiohead a strong proponent of file sharing.  Other bands and artists, including Metallica and Madonna, have heavily criticized file sharing, saying it steals money out of their pockets, and hurts smaller artists.

Despite the pleas of some musicians, it’s up to the record labels as to how they handle the issue of file sharing in the new digital age.  Although there has been a growing number of digital download services, problems such as DRM and pricing still need to be worked out.

3 Comments

Zod
Posts: 642
Posted on: 06 Apr 09 17:27
If your an established band you don't need record labels, so you can just put your album on the internet. If you're a new band it'd be hard to get noticed without a label? IE if you just release your stuff on the internet, hows anyone supposed to find it in the cluster**** of the internet Since record labels dont' really sign good bands anymore, I'm all for p2p. Maybe bands will form their own organization to help promote themselves while the RIAA goes under.
shaolin007
Posts: 883
Posted on: 07 Apr 09 01:00
I don't know if it exists, but some site dedicated to new artists to share their music with the masses, sort of like they do with open source, would be nice and I feel would get them some attention.

"One of Radiohead's most recent record releases, In Rainbows, was available as freeware -- pay as much as you want to -- digital download, with more than 1.75 million copes sold of the release."

I think that is a great idea and I think more should do it. If their album sucks, I don't feel like I lost anything on it. However, if it was good, I would give them something for it. This would also keep crap out of circulation because now you have to produce something good or else.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 07 Apr 09 07:42
@ Zod
Bands still have to play live to get noticed. That's how they would promote themselves and connect fans to a website with downloads. If they are really good, then word of mouth would help distribution as well.

It's sad to see we are living in this American Idol era creating the expectation that you no longer have to do the grunt work to get noticed. Someone else will get you noticed.

Getting signed by a major label is no guarantee they will stand behind you and promote you to popularity. It's a numbers game today, and if the numbers don't add up in favour of the major labels, you don't get special treatment.

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.

Most popular headlines

Copyright lawsuit goes after unsecured WiFi network owners (8)

A lawsuit, filed in Massachusetts, could give an answer to whether or not an individual is responsible for material downloaded via their network when that network is left unsecured. The suit was filed by Liberty Media Holdings LLC, a San Diego company that produces adult content.

Fake 'Temple Run' game app briefly pops up in Android Market

  • Wed 8 Feb 00:40 by Justin_Massoud
  • E-Readers and Tablets, Mobile Phones, Online Retailers, Software

Imangi Studios' hit iOS game "Temple Run" is slated to hit Android platforms on February 9. Cyber scammers seized on the anticipated event by uploading a malicious facsimile of the mobile app to the Android Market this week, infecting downloaders' devices with annoying advertisements and, worse still, no actual game.

Canadian man pays over $1,000 to stream a handful of Netflix movies (1)

  • Thu 9 Feb 13:00 by Justin_Massoud
  • Movies, Notebooks/Laptops, Online Video

Most Netflix members pay $8/month to stream movies and TV shows to PCs and game consoles. That low price is partially what helped the company become a household name. Saskatchewan native John Gibson, however, managed to rack up over $10,000 in costs during a recent vacation.

Cable TV Co's lobby the government to mandate set-top boxes (4)

  • Thu 9 Feb 03:13 by etdragon
  • LCD TV, Media Players

Declining subscriber numbers seem to be forcing cable companies to attempt to push for drastic changes. Companies are lobbying the FCC to put regulations in place which would require every subscriber to rent a cable box or cable card regardless of whether or not they currently have a need for one.

See all headlines

Active Commenters