TorrentSpy loses Californian copyright lawsuit

20 Dec 07 19:20 by Seán Byrne in category Uncategorized To news archive

The BitTorrent indexing website TorrentSpy.com has lost a Californian copyright case as a result of a federal judge ruling in favour of the MPAA that it had hid and destructed evidence, which made a fair trial impossible.  The court claims this harsh decision was necessary as it had such an impact on the movie studios’ ability to prove its case that it would make it impossible to make a rightful decision.  As expected, the MPAA hailed the court’s decision as a significant victory for the major Hollywood studios. 

Going by the court, TorrentSpy’s operators have engaged in a widespread systematic effort to destroy evidence, including modifying/deleting directory titles containing copyrighted titles, forum posts detailing how to find certain copyrighted works and the IP addresses of forum members and it also hid the names and addresses of forum moderators, despite being ordered to preserve all these details.  TorrentSpy was previously fined $30,000 for withholding information and was warned about severe consequences if they do this again.

TorrentSpy’s attorney Ira Rothken claims no data was intentionally destroyed and that some actions were taken to protect the privacy of the website’s users.  He went on to say that TorrentSpy will appeal the decision, as the movie studios have not proved their case, let alone proved that TorrentSpy was involved in any copyright infringement.  Finally, he said that the site is back to business as usual with its servers located in The Netherlands. 

Further info on this can be read on c|net and on PC World.

 

2 Comments

DeadMan
Posts: 1563
Posted on: 20 Dec 07 20:29
Whilst I side with TorrentSpy it is true that they should NOT be changing things that can be used as evidence after they had been ordered not to touch anything. If they had done these things BEFORE they were taken to court then it would be a different matter. This is not about MPAA vs. users privacy but about changing evidence after the fact and is a purely law orientated decision. Not about who is right or wrong.
guest
Posts: 15288
Posted on: 22 Dec 07 10:05
Ya thats what people need the MPAA grabbing IPs other information from them. Good for them for protection people. MPAA can rot in hell along with the RIAA. Money grubbing scum.

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.

Most popular headlines

Grandmother is falsely accused of file-sharing (11)

A woman falsely accused of downloading copyrighted movies might've lost her Internet connection had she not taken her case to the media.

PS3 closing ground on Xbox 360 (1)

  • Sat 6 Feb 14:00 by Randomus
  • Game Consoles

After years of trailing the Nintendo Wii and Microsoft Xbox 360 on the sales charts, the Sony PlayStation 3 continues to close the gap on the Xbox 360.

Blame Blu-ray for lack of PS3 game downloads (13)

Don't expect Sony to offer its full game catalog for download over the Playstation 3 any time soon.

Murdoch: Avatar DVD won't be 3D (17)

  • Thu 4 Feb 00:00 by Randomus
  • Blu-Ray writers & players, LCD TV

News Corp. CEO Robert Murdoch confirmed the DVD release of Avatar won't have 3D support, with no word on a possible 3D Blu-ray version.

See all headlines

Active Commenters