UK ISP’s don’t have to disconnect pirates

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.
26 Jan 09 19:18 by Jared Newman in category Uncategorized To news archive

The British government has ruled out legislation that would force Internet Service Providers to ban illicit file sharers.

Intellectual Property Minister David Lammy told the Times that complex legal issues preclude any such legislation. "I’m not sure it’s actually going to be possible," he said.

An estimated 7 million Internet users in Britain share music files illegally, and the BPI, which represents the music industry, says peer to peer sharing costs its members £180 million per year. There are signs that ISP’s and the BPI are working together; they’ve created several working groups to draw up solutions and service providers have pledged to send 1,000 letters a week to illegal file sharers.

Lammy said he hoped this cooperation would prevent "the heavy hand of legislation."

The situation in Britain resembles the Recording Industry Association of America’s efforts to fight piracy, as the U.S. industry trade group recently said it will stop suing individual file sharers. Just as the BPI wants service providers to enforce a "three-steps policy," the RIAA is looking to iron out a program with US based ISP’s in which repeat offenders could lose their Internet access.

In addition, the RIAA has ruled out ISP filtering of copyrighted material coming through various peer to peer networks. For now, the service providers will simply pass along a letter of detection to illicit file sharers, not unlike the agreement to send letters in Britain.

Both countries are still working on a way to stop illegal file sharing in a manner that satisfies all parties involved. Cara Duckworth, an RIAA spokeswoman, told CDFreaks today that there are no official updates on any new anti-piracy measures.

2 Comments

vikampion
Posts: 160
Posted on: 27 Jan 09 18:47
I know one way to "satisfy all parties involved". Charge me $20 a month to download whatever I want from whereever I want. This is a win-win for everyone. The RIAA doesn't have to worry about spending money keeping servers to host music. The ISPs don't have to worry about sending out letters to those that would pay the fee. The consumer doesn't have to worry about lawsuits. Plus, the RIAA is getting money in return for not having to do anything.....Of course, you know they would never do this.
Zod
Posts: 438
Posted on: 27 Jan 09 23:11
Monthly fees are bad, because then the RIAA will want their cut, the MPAA will want their cut, and here in Canada even the newspapers want a cut for some messed up reason. Everyone who loses money because of the internet will want to start tacking on fees. That and the RIAA is bad enough right now with putting out crappy product, and being uncompetitive, I don't think we should give them free money to keep rolling out crap.

Post a comment

Most popular headlines

Modders already fixing banned Xbox 360s (4)

  • Thursday 19 November 01:02 by JaredNewman
  • Game Consoles, Piracy

It takes a bit of technical know-how to modify your Xbox 360 for unintended purposes, so it's not surprising that modders have already devised ways to stop Microsoft's anti-piracy measures.

Warner starts DVD to Blu-ray trade-ups (9)

The problem with being a movie enthusiast and upgrading to Blu-ray is that you're stuck with an entire library of DVDs, but Warner Home Video is now offering incentives to help boost your Blu-ray catalog.

The Pirate Bay shuts down its tracker (2)

The slow dismantling of The Pirate Bay continues, deactivating what was once the largest torrent tracker on the Internet.

CD is dead, says premium audio maker (3)

  • Saturday 21 November 00:49 by JaredNewman
  • CD/DVD Players

A company whose primary business was once in high-end CD players for audiophiles says the CD player is done for.

See all headlines

Active Commenters