You know the feeling: Watching TV, reclined comfortably on the couch, when suddenly a booming advertisement startles you, forcing you to scramble for mute button. And this happens during every commercial break.
A bill is making its way through the U.S. Congress, asking the FCC to regulate the volume of television ads. The “Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act” (CALM) seeks, quite simply to keep the volume of ads in line with the programs they support. The bill, introduced by Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-CA), is awaiting a vote in the House Energy and Commerce committee, having cleared a subcommittee, Ars Technica reports.
“Most Americans are not overjoyed to watch television commercials, but they are willing to tolerate them to sustain free over-the-air television. What annoys all of us is the sudden increase of volume when commercials are aired,” Eshoo said.

Interest in this issue isn’t isolated to Congress. ATSC, a group that sets television specs in the U.S., has an Audio Loudness group that tackles the matter, along with issues of volume variations between stations. And some TV manufacturers include compression features to keep volume within a certain range. Dolby, meanwhile, is working on a solution that regulates volume while preserving the audio’s dynamic range.
Most amusing, however, is that the FCC actually recommends muting a commercial if it’s too loud. Therein lies the foolishness of excessively loud commercials: If they’re so annoying that viewers intentionally try to avoid them, doesn’t that defeat the purpose of making them louder to begin with?
23 Comments on Bill wants to quiet loud commercials
|
I just posted the article Bill wants to quiet loud commercials.
Read the full article here: http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/21011-b...mmercials.html Feel free to add your comments below. Please note that the reactions from the complete site will be synched below. |
I hate commercials
. It really tees me off
when a commercial break takes so long i have to think twice about what movie or show i am even watching! Quiet loud commercials? How about a "delete" button on the TV remote
? I better drink a beer and calm down before i hire a terrorist to... ahhh, a good cold beer. Now that TV signals are digital, it should actually be easier to make the volume consistent. However, the broadcasters need to make sure they don't screw up the dynamic range, frequency response, etc. of the digital sound for movies and other content. I don't think that most people would want their movie explosions to be the same volume, frequency range, etc. as someone clapping their hands.
|
I find myself more and more using my HDD recorder and starting to watch shows 15 to 20 minutes late so I can zap the commercials and still end the show on time.
|
Having recently gained access to digital tv (but no digital tuner in the recorder), I now sometimes watch live tv despite of the commercials because of better picture quality, but I'm looking for a good digital recorder or PVR solution.
The volume level on commercials on some stations here have been much louder than the volume on the useful content, but recently it's not as bad as it was previously. They probably got too many complaints about it.
Commercials are loud, that is a given, but there are better things I think congress should be focusing on. Here is one, how about going after cellular companies for draconian restrictions on phones, proprietary connections, overpriced plans, exclusivity contracts, not being able to take my phone to another provider because of branding, and the list goes on.
There is another volume issue that I've noticed lately .Music during the show really going up in volume to the point I need to turn it down & sometimes it makes dialog that sometimes goes on at the same time difficult to hear.It's not hard to figure out networks are being paid by the recording companies to do this.To promote the music of performers.
Last on the cell phones .I would like to see a total ban on cell phone use while driving.This would also include passengers because like alcohol Open Container laws it is too easy to pass a cell to a passenger.Just like a beer is.
If that is not the reason for Open Container laws(on the passengers too)then why would it matter if an adult passenger drank six beers or more & had the empties in the vehicle.
So the cell would be the same.
I remember some of the words to Safety Dance. "You can dance if you want to. You can leave your friends behind. 'Cause your friends don't dance and if they don't dance, then they're no friends of mine." Then some annoying, high-pitched synthesizer notes.
small flatron TV from SONY for my wife to see the Italian RAI NEWS in the dining room, and this SONY was the first product that electronically faded the peaks of the TV volume to the standard setting..... later also in the Hague, (politics) their were asked questions to call the networks to correct this, after two years, the commercialnetworks began to experiment with commercial words and icons thru the end of a film or serie,
and a short time they tried to get instead of a 5 minute commercial serie, to double it up to 10 minutes, the public respond by mass complaining at a special commission
who had to control this, it went alright for a year, by now the commercial networks say they had a financial problem from the so called crisis..... again at the beginning!
gr.HarwareHarry
… The second complaint is in volume levels. One would think with better technology and now going digital once could control the transmission volume levels better. Not only does the volume change between the various TV channels but even between various commercials and different shows on the same channels. Its not that the volume changes a little it changes significantly. If this it the new improved digital it needs to be fixed…
Reply from the station was to wait until they moved into their new broadcasting facilities and when they go 100% digital. Of course this did not resolve the problem. The reply from the FCC was just a couple of booklets explaining the digital transition and the need for a converter box. It as if the FCC never read my letter.
I am receiving the local broadcasts via the air waves (TV antenna) and have also noticed various differences from station to station as well. Lastly there are stations which broadcast the same information on several different channels and one channel who for months just broadcast its channel identification. With all the talk about going green it seems like a total waste of power to transmit redundant information. Chicago examples are 20-1 WYCC-HD & 20-2 WYCC-SD, 23-1, METV & 26-2 METV, 26-3 METOO & 48-1 METOO, and 44-1 WSNS-HD & 44-2 WSNS-DT. Then there is station 26-5 THIS that has been just broadcasting the same sign for at least 2 months. Can anyone explain the reasoning for this?
I have relatives that leave the TV on in their living room basically 24/7. It is a constant source of annoying noise, reaching ear splitting levels on every commercial. I don't know how they can stand it.
|
I hope this legislation passes with the penalty being death to offenders.
|

25 years earlier we visit a lot our family overthere and the Italians where speaking fast and loud and at the same time, plus the television volume was at a high volume, that I went a little crazy, and moved out of the house to the garden...
nowadays they are more concious of their loud speakings, and they can't stand it theirselves. 
So just how many products, pills, services, cleaners, etc. do the companies who pay for these ads to air think they're selling with so many people muting their ads? Don't they realize the higher pumped volume is defeating the purpose of the ad entirely? When a commercial is that annoying, I don't care what it's selling, there's no way I'd shop there, use their products, take their stupid blue pills or buy anything they're trying to peddle. I know I'm not the only one who instantly hits the mute button.
The Sci-Fi/SyFy channel is another one that has overly loud ads. I now pay extra to my cable company for a DVR where I can record what I want to see, and then bypass all the commercials. It's rare that I watch a show at the time of its broadcast now.
And ditto cholla on the music volume. My wife is a big fan of Law & Order but swelling dramatic score in the last 5 minutes overwhelms the dialog to the point that you can't even hear the dramatic conclusion, you just have to infer from the dramatic volume swell.
As for me, explosion volumes are only loud enough when my teenage boys get out of bed, come downstairs and complain that they have been awakened.
|
Broadcasters have had noise suppression mechanisms for years. In fact it could easily be built into most TV's but rarely is. Adverts are inherently shouty shouty. They want your attention. Of course there is a simpler answer. Hit the mute button everytime the ads come on.
|
gr. HardwareHarry
Most popular headlines
Windows Blue to allow boot to desktop and brings start menu back? (3)
- Tue 16 Apr 16:12 by DoMiN8ToR
- Software, Windows 8
The upcoming update of Windows 8 might allow users to boot to the desktop again.
Jobs in US entertainment industry on all-time high - piracy?! (8)
- Fri 12 Apr 15:10 by DoMiN8ToR
- Piracy
The number of jobs in the film and music industry in the United States has increased despite the claimed negative effects of illegal downloads.
The Piratebay domain moves to Greenland - circumvents blockade (3)
- Tue 9 Apr 14:23 by DoMiN8ToR
- Piracy
The PirateBay has moved to the domain thepiratebay.gl in fear that their previous domain would be ceased by Swedish authorities
Intel 9 series chipset has native SATA Express (SATA over PCIe) support (2)
- Wed 17 Apr 13:57 by DoMiN8ToR
- Solid State (ssd)
A Chinese tech site has posted a picture that reveals details on Intel's 9 series chipset.



