Bittorrent Pirate to pay $1.5M
Would be porn pirate Kywan Fisher has just had the shock of his life after declining to defend himself in a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by porn producer Flava Works in the USA.
In what is believed to be the biggest ever file sharing award the Court levied the maximum $150,000 fine per movie making a total of $1,500,000 fine for distributing the ten copyrighted movies.
Fisher had downloaded the movies from Flava’s online pay to view service then uploaded and shared the contents via bittorrent. Unknown to Fisher though was the fact that Flava Works watermark all the movies they transmit online with a unique code personal to that individual subscriber, in this case Fisher.
Flava Works were therefore able to produce evidence showing that the films were all watermarked with the code specific to Fisher’s account and had been either viewed or downloaded 3,449 times.
Flava Works claimed deliberate and “wilful copyright infringement” and US Judge John Lee noted in his summation that in view of the lack of any defence he was forced to issue a default judgement in favour of the Plaintiff.
Fisher has been unavailable for comment and it’s not clear whether he intends to appeal or face bankruptcy. Ironically though, Fisher was one of fifteen people originally pursued by Flava Works and all these other cases were dropped earlier in the year due to lack of evidence.
Whatever Fisher is thinking now though not defending himself was clearly a very costly and colossal mistake.
TorrentFreak has more on this story here.
There are 5 comments
- MyCE Member
- Posted on: 03 Nov 12 13:33
- MyCE Die Hard
- Posted on: 03 Nov 12 14:16
This is just so hilarious, though. Thinking with their heads.
- MyCE Resident
- Posted on: 03 Nov 12 16:51
- MyCE Resident
- Posted on: 04 Nov 12 09:08
I think its a cruel and unusual punishment (and the punishment doesn't fit the crime). White Collar crime gets off easier then pirating.
- MyCE Rookie
- Posted on: 04 Nov 12 11:20
Excessive fines clause is a clause of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which prohibits the imposition of excessive fines. Excessive fines clause limits the government's power to extract payments, whether in cash or in kind, as punishment for an offense. The touchstone of the constitutional inquiry under the excessive fines clause is the principle of proportionality. The amount of the forfeiture must bear some relationship to the gravity of the offense that it is designed to punish.
A punitive forfeiture violates the excessive fines clause if it is grossly disproportional to the gravity of a defendant's offense.
One may in theory use this as an argument in a U.S Court I'm not sure however folks are probably not educated about this law.
Most popular headlines
- Wed 4 Dec 02:12 by DoMiN8ToR
A leaked roadmap from Intel provides more information on Intel's Fultondale and Pleasantdale SSDs and reveals the codename of a SSD series, the Temple
- Wed 4 Dec 05:12 by Kerry56
The USB 3.0 Promoter Group announced today that the development of a new type of USB connector has begun. It is called USB Type-C, and will be b
- Mon 2 Dec 06:12 by DoMiN8ToR
Windows 8 market share dropped from 7.49% to 6.66% this month, Windows 8.1 market share increased from 1.72% to 2.64%. Combined both Windows 8 version
- Mon 2 Dec 05:12 by DoMiN8ToR
An official statement from an OCZ employee learns us the company will honor product warranties. Last week OCZ announced it would file for bankruptcy a
- Fri 6 Dec 04:12 by Kerry56
With only a simple notice buried in a chart on the Microsoft life cycle fact sheet, Microsoft has ended retail sales of their most widely used operati