Notebooks shipping with Blu-ray players will take off during the second half of 2010, but will continue to struggle until then, according to new reports.
The lack of adoption is due to the relatively high cost of slim-type Blu-ray players — in the $100 price range — while slim-type DVD burners are available for less than $20 now.
The $100 price estimate is expected to drop significantly as the industry gets closer to the second half of 2010, with the cost savings expected to transfer to consumers.
Blu-ray will move from a “niche” technology and finally go “mainstream” next year due to the falling prices and a recovering economy, the NPD research group said in its annual report. Until the industry transforms, the high-end sector will continue to provide built-in Blu-ray players — and depending how much of a price drop takes place, it’s possible Blu-ray notebooks will continue to stay in the high-end.
Last year, “cutting-edge” consumers — who account for 20 percent of U.S. consumers — represented 64 percent of Blu-ray owners. The number of “cutting-edge” Blu-ray owners has dropped, to just 38 percent now, which shows more mainstream adoption of the format.
I believe the price drop has to be significant, or consumers will continue to sit on the fence waiting for a real price drop. Even though regular consumers are finally becoming interested in Blu-ray, it still could be some time before they want it in their notebooks if the price remains too high.
19 Comments on Blu-ray laptops expected to increase in 2010
I don't understand why anyone would want a laptop with just a blu-ray player. I also doubt that blu-ray burners or blank blu-ray disks will be that affordable in 2010.
Optimal? Of course not, but DVD/CD-RW combo drives were very common for awhile, until DVD burners became affordable.
Blu-Ray burners will become affordable... it'll just take a year or two. In the meantime, combo drives will be a good compromise.
| but DVD/CD-RW combo drives were very common for awhile, until DVD burners became affordable. |

Having a portable (3.5kg
) bluray player is of course one of the uses for such a drive in a laptop. But in my case, as for many others, laptops are where you do your work. I have my home cinema already, and I have my personal PC for other staff not work related, I have my netbook for the essentials when traveling.. I really can't imagine being in a situation where i would use my laptop for playing a movie and have a TV around for connecting it to the laptop etc. But I guess others do.
.. and no, HD is not meant to be played even in 17inch screens
|
If they don't have a 1080P display they probably don't have 1080P video cards,
|
And nowadays, even chipset integrated video has built-in video acceleration that is good enough for HD video.
Michael

| And nowadays, even chipset integrated video has built-in video acceleration that is good enough for HD video. |
Just like DVD, it is optimized for your SDTV and still look good on HDTV sets but many people watch on their 7" portable player or convert to ipod etc. Blu-ray will be like that some days, it's just another media.
|
What ferd is trying to say, and I fully agree, is that watching HD in a 15inch monitor makes no sense, even if the resolution is supported which in most cases is not (by the monitor resolution). Some 17-18 inch monitor laptops might support the resolutions (personally I feel that even then there's no point in watching HD - at least not in less than 22inch monitors), but then there's no value in the "portable bluray player" that Steven mentioned, unless you consider portable a laptop of 6 kilos
![]() YEs, Intel's 4500HD just came out, but if the monitor resolution does not support HD, then there's no difference is there? |
|
Yeah, it's really convenient to fish around and find your HDMI cable so you can play your Blu-ray movie from your lap top. Most laptops do not have 1080P displays. If they do, they are 17 or 18 inch displays and the laptop weighs about 9 or 10 pounds (not counting bag and accessories). Real handy for lugging around. If they don't have a 1080P display they probably don't have 1080P video cards, so what would be the benefit? If the blu-ray disks look "dazzling" on your 17 inch display, you must be easily dazzled.
|
|
This response, along with others posted by ferd and hemispasm, are good examples of the lack of critical thinking frequently exhibited in this forum. First of all, because something makes no sense to you means just that. Your views are far from universal. Second many laptops have larger screens with good portability. I recently had mine on a journey from San Francisco to Rome for five weeks and experienced no back pain carrying my 17 inch 1440x900 display. Those of you who think in kilos might have difficulty however. Finally, we should all welcome all options possible and let the market decide what "makes no sense". In all fairness I should also admit that I was a big fan of the Betamax VCR, the LaserDisc platform and of course HD DVD...
|

As i pointed out several times in my posts, this is my personal opinion which is of course far from a universal truth, as far as yours is. And this is a forum were people post their personal opinions, now if a lack of critical thinking is what you usually find here, you are welcome to open up our minds with yours, as long as it is an opinion and not your universal truth. Have a nice day.

Edit: I am travelling abroad at least 10 to 15 times per year, for short 3-4 days at a time, carrying around a 17inch laptop each time aint my cup of tee, but if it is fine for you, then whatever floats your boat
But your universal truth about 17inch laptops being easily portable is far from mine, from where I am standing. Being part of the market, such as I am, I have decided that this makes no sense. Whether or not the rest of the market agrees with me remains to be seen. I will try to modify my personal opinions in the future so that they conform to what you and/or everyone else thinks is "universal". Is it OK if I check with you first, before I post, to make sure that my opinions represent critical-enough thinking and are universal enough?
|
@steven2874
Being part of the market, such as I am, I have decided that this makes no sense. Whether or not the rest of the market agrees with me remains to be seen. I will try to modify my personal opinions in the future so that they conform to what you and/or everyone else thinks is "universal". Is it OK if I check with you first, before I post, to make sure that my opinions represent critical-enough thinking and are universal enough? |
I think that is enough non critical thinking for me in this thread
Most popular headlines
Windows Blue to allow boot to desktop and brings start menu back? (3)
- Tue 16 Apr 16:12 by DoMiN8ToR
- Software, Windows 8
The upcoming update of Windows 8 might allow users to boot to the desktop again.
Jobs in US entertainment industry on all-time high - piracy?! (8)
- Fri 12 Apr 15:10 by DoMiN8ToR
- Piracy
The number of jobs in the film and music industry in the United States has increased despite the claimed negative effects of illegal downloads.
The Piratebay domain moves to Greenland - circumvents blockade (3)
- Tue 9 Apr 14:23 by DoMiN8ToR
- Piracy
The PirateBay has moved to the domain thepiratebay.gl in fear that their previous domain would be ceased by Swedish authorities
Intel 9 series chipset has native SATA Express (SATA over PCIe) support (2)
- Wed 17 Apr 13:57 by DoMiN8ToR
- Solid State (ssd)
A Chinese tech site has posted a picture that reveals details on Intel's 9 series chipset.



