Intel SSD roadmap leaks – reveals Temple Star SSDs and heatsinks
[Note: all sensitive information has been removed upon request of Intel
A leaked roadmap from Intel provides more information on Intel’s Fultondale and Pleasantdale SSDs and reveals the codename of a SSD series, the Temple Star SSDs. The latter is the codename for Intel’s Pro 2500 series of which some details already emerged.
The roadmap seems to be the follow up of a roadmap which was leaked a couple of months ago. We consider the Temple Star the most interesting fact of the roadmap. While the SSD Pro 2500 Series, as it will appear in stores emerged before, the codename was previously not seen before.
[removed per request]
Here are some additional images from the roadmap, showing all currently known Intel SSD code names along with how they’ll end up in stores and when. It also clearly shows Intel prefers 20 nm MLC NAND. The Fultondale SSDS use High Endurance Technology (HET) NAND which should provide SLC like endurance.
The Fultondale (DC P3700) and Pleasantdale (DC P3500) series are pretty good looking. Earlier today VR-Zone posted that Intel appears to have issues with the heat these drive generate. The top of the drives is likely kind of a heatsink.
There are 7 comments
- Posted on: 04 Dec 13 14:57
- MyCE Resident
- Posted on: 04 Dec 13 15:08
Originally Posted by Intel
10 drive writes PER DAY FOR 5 YEARS.
- Senior Administrator & Reviewer
- Posted on: 04 Dec 13 17:14
Then again, I'm sure anyone who can afford these SSDs once they launch will have no problem paying for the power consumption.
- Posted on: 04 Dec 13 18:02
- New Member
- Posted on: 05 Dec 13 19:29
Looks like a 2308 on this as well... The high power will be a given with that performance.. Even the 2008 we saw in the Kingspec review was pushing something like 18W active at speeds just below:
The difference with the 2008 was that it had great read and write performance and wasn't only read intensive. This is recentlky shown in the newer LSI products as well.
- Posted on: 05 Dec 13 19:46
- MyCE Resident
- Posted on: 07 Dec 13 15:18
Originally Posted by Tweakr
Maybe it is due to poor effectiveness with the PCIe type drives.
Only thing I can guess is that it's a type error.
Most popular headlines
- Fri 12 Sep 12:09 by DoMiN8ToR
The popular mobile radio app TuneIn receives a lot of negative comments after th...
- Tue 16 Sep 08:09 by DoMiN8ToR
Russian leaker WZOR has posted information about Windows 9 again, revealing...
- Fri 12 Sep 07:09 by DoMiN8ToR
Xbox One owners complain about noise coming out of their game console. The issue...
- Thu 11 Sep 05:09 by DoMiN8ToR
Several German websites have been provided with new screenshots of Windows 9. Th...
- Mon 15 Sep 01:09 by Vroom
Review: Kingston DT HyperX 3.0 64GB Reviewed by: Antonis Sapanidis P...