Pirate group leader pleads guilty, faces $250,000 fine & jail time
California resident and accused online piracy ring mastermind Richard Franco Montejano pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit criminal copyright infringement on Monday according to a Department of Justice statement.
The 29-year-old Montejano told Los Angeles judge George H. King that he intentionally lead a warez group called “Old School Classics” for five years – ironically the same amount of time he could spend in prison pending sentencing.
OSC illegally reproduced and distributed various music over the internet said the DoJ, eventually joining forces with two pirates from a previously disbanded warez group called “Rabid Neurosis.” Those members, Bennie Glover and James Anthony Dockery, were sentenced last year to three months of jail time for their illicit contributions. The pair pleaded guilty to the same crime Montejano admitted to, giving the now-convicted pirate some hope for leniency.
From the DoJ press release:
Montajano admitted that he maintained a computer server at his Harbor City residence to which other OSC members uploaded pirated music. He admitted that a member of OSC uploaded the Kanye West album “Graduation,” to Montejano’s server in August 2007, more than one week before the album was commercially released. Montejano also admitted using his server to upload pirated music to other warez group servers.
Montejano’s sentencing is tentatively scheduled for July 25th. (Via The U.S. Department of Justice)
Do you believe that a quarter million dollar fine plus jail time is appropriate for this type of crime? Sound off with us in the comments.
1 Comments on Pirate group leader pleads guilty, faces $250,000 fine & jail time
- Posts: 431
- Posted on: 05 May 11 16:51
As for the punishment, five year sentence and a quarter million dollar fine seems like a lot, but to my thinking that depends on the amount of money he made from it. If he makes an income from piracy that seems like it should be a crime, with a sentence, but if he was just a member of a file sharing scene (which this sounds like it was) than I think it should be much less. The difference being that if he makes money selling what an artist makes without giving the artist his fair portion of the proceeds then he has effectually robbed the artist of confirmed sales. If he is just freely making the music that others have shared with him available he may actually be encouraging people to purchase that music.
Most popular headlines
- Tue 16 Apr 16:12 by DoMiN8ToR
- Software, Windows 8
The upcoming update of Windows 8 might allow users to boot to the desktop again.
- Fri 12 Apr 15:10 by DoMiN8ToR
The number of jobs in the film and music industry in the United States has increased despite the claimed negative effects of illegal downloads.
- Tue 9 Apr 14:23 by DoMiN8ToR
The PirateBay has moved to the domain thepiratebay.gl in fear that their previous domain would be ceased by Swedish authorities
- Wed 17 Apr 13:57 by DoMiN8ToR
- Solid State (ssd)
A Chinese tech site has posted a picture that reveals details on Intel's 9 series chipset.