Rumor: Wii 2 with HD and Blu-ray launching in 2011?

11 Aug 10 00:00 by Randomus in category Game Consoles To news archive

There is a new wave of rumors discussing the possible release of a Nintendo Wii 2 game console that will include high-definition content and Blu-ray Disc support.

Similar to the Sony PlayStation 3, the new Wii 2 is rumored to have an HD output and built-in Blu-ray drive, but it’s unknown when Nintendo will announce the mystical console, or if it’s even real.

The addition of streaming content and more interactive services offered through the Xbox 360 and PS3 has forced Nintendo to shake things up.  The PS3 ships with a built-in Blu-ray player, while Microsoft relies on Xbox Live to support Netflix and other streaming content — Nintendo has added Netflix and other basic streaming services, but the lack of Blu-ray or HD are seen as major disadvantages for their console.

I’m not fully convinced Nintendo would try to integrate Blu-ray into the Wii 2, because it’d be cheaper to start with HD support only.  In addition, Microsoft has had great success with its paid Xbox Live service that doesn’t include Blu-ray, while Sony has Blu-ray and the free PlayStation Network for PS3 gamers.

The Wii held a significant lead over the Xbox 360 and PS3 since its launch, as gamers were instantly drawn to the Wiimote, the Nintendo party games and its lower price tag.  Since then, the lead has shrunk while Microsoft and Sony offer new streaming features, HD content, downloads, and other features that the Wii still lacks.

Another common complaint is that the Wii game catalog isn’t as appealing as the Xbox 360 or PS3 — though Nintendo is working to fix this issue. Sony and Microsoft recently cut pricing on their consoles. Nintendo had a $50 price cut last September, which brought the price of the Wii down to $199.  I think it’s unlikely the Wii will receive another price cut, even with the addition of a new HD model launch.

14 Comments

Grim107
Posts: 98
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 01:38
When is Nintendo going to realize that the Wii sucks? The only thing it's good for is porting ScummVm to.
Blu-rayFreak
Posts: 954
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 01:45
The common perception is that the Wii is just a toy. They are in dire need of a hardware upgrade in order to compete better with PS3 and Xbox 360. Who wants to play pixelly low resolution games?
Grim107
Posts: 98
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 02:51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-rayFreak View Post
The common perception is that the Wii is just a toy. They are in dire need of a hardware upgrade in order to compete better with PS3 and Xbox 360. Who wants to play pixelly low resolution games?
I find that last sentence rather entertaining. I obviously don't speak for the mainstream gamer, but I enjoy games of the 90's. ScummVm (what I mentioned before) is an interpretor for games using the Scumm (and similar) engines. What do you think LucasArts was making before the seemingly endless supply of Star Wars titles? Do a minute of research and I assure you that you'll be shocked.

Anyway, the real reason I think the Wii sucks is that you aren't using standard controllers. I find the motion control very annoying. It's harder to play games because you need to bring physical action into them. You can't just have the four main buttons at the tip of your thumb. I think that there's a reason the PS3 was made to use traditional controllers.

While I'm not a fan of the series, I've played multi-player mode on one of the newer CoD games on both the Xbox and the Wii. I found it idiotic that only one player can move around in the Wii version. Where's the second character? Is he sitting on the other's shoulders?

One final note is that I find it hard to even select options in the menus of the Wii and its games. You need to have a VERY steady arm/hand.
Blu-rayFreak
Posts: 954
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 03:58
Okay, what I should've said is "Who wants to play low resolution pixelly games on a high definition television?"

I've obviously enjoyed many low resolution games in times past, including pong! But with the proliferation of HDTV's in current times, it almost hurts your eyes to go backwards when you're used to enjoying High Definition content.
debro
Posts: 12921
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 08:56
Playing a wii on a HDTV takes me back to my childhood ... when I bloyed with lego ....

Lots of Blocks

I have no trouble whatsoever using the wii ... although admittedly, I have to duck a little to get my arm to the right height for the sensor to pick up the controller properly when navigating menus ....

If you're having trouble using the menu's, have you tried adjusting the wii sensor - in the software / menu?
Jedi Master Yoda
Posts: 1330
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 19:57
Rather play a low res game that's good rather than a high res game that's crap. There's some people out there that won't play the Wii because it's standard def, but they are missing out on some good games.
wconeybeer
Posts: 645
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 20:00
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-rayFreak View Post
Okay, what I should've said is "Who wants to play low resolution pixelly games on a high definition television?"

I've obviously enjoyed many low resolution games in times past, including pong! But with the proliferation of HDTV's in current times, it almost hurts your eyes to go backwards when you're used to enjoying High Definition content.
The newer Wii games have actually surprised me. They still don't compare to the graphics of Xbox 360 & PS3, but they've come a LONG way since the Wii was first released. Still cartoonish, but not pixelated like I remembered.

(Note: Just got a Wii last month. Comparison is to friend's systems bought shortly after Wii release.)
BradWright
Posts: 134
Posted on: 11 Aug 10 22:01
This comment is based solely on observation, since I don't really play games on any of the consoles. My son has a Wii and an XBox 360. He mostly uses the XBox, but occassionally uses the Wii as a change of pace. It looks to me like the games he plays on the XBox have their different characters, different weapons, and different scenery, but the actual game play itself, they're all basically the same game. It seems to me that the Wii has a bigger variety of games that are actually not just different variations of the same game.
Grim107
Posts: 98
Posted on: 12 Aug 10 01:07
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradWright View Post
This comment is based solely on observation, since I don't really play games on any of the consoles. My son has a Wii and an XBox 360. He mostly uses the XBox, but occassionally uses the Wii as a change of pace. It looks to me like the games he plays on the XBox have their different characters, different weapons, and different scenery, but the actual game play itself, they're all basically the same game. It seems to me that the Wii has a bigger variety of games that are actually not just different variations of the same game.
That's actually what I hate most bout modern gaming; especially the Call of Duty franchise. The same game is being sold over and over. A new game in the series seems to come out every year. At that rate, real thought can't be put into making the game good. Rather, they take everyone for idiots by making the graphics really good and spending no time on the storyline or perfecting gameplay.

I personally like to stay away from any first person shooters. Just about the only series I can stand is the Half-Life franchise. Tons of thought is put into creating outstanding story lines. The game isn't senseless running around and shooting. You constantly have to solve puzzles to progress. The environment is very interactive (especially in the second game). Hell, they even bother to throw in a physics engine for the second game. I understand that by today's standards, the graphics of the original Half-Life and its expansions are "crap", but I'd sacrifice good graphics for a great game any day.

By the way, I don't own any of these consoles either. The only console I've ever owned is the Sega Dreamcast, which I still use today. (Yes, I know that almost all of the Dreamcast games sucked, but its homebrew abilities are amazing. You don't even need a mod chip).
GotBeer?
Posts: 74
Posted on: 12 Aug 10 18:21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim107 View Post
Anyway, the real reason I think the Wii sucks is that you aren't using standard controllers. I find the motion control very annoying. It's harder to play games because you need to bring physical action into them. You can't just have the four main buttons at the tip of your thumb. I think that there's a reason the PS3 was made to use traditional controllers.
You do realize that "very annoying" motion control is the Wii's biggest selling point? 'The Force Unleashed' and 'MadWorld' wouldn't be near as much fun if all I was doing was mashing buttons.
jalyst
Posts: 88
Posted on: 17 Aug 10 14:40
If it's just blu-ray support who cares....
If it's a more substantial GPU/CPU overhaul wake me up please!
debro
Posts: 12921
Posted on: 17 Aug 10 15:43
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotBeer? View Post
You do realize that "very annoying" motion control is the Wii's biggest selling point? 'The Force Unleashed' and 'MadWorld' wouldn't be near as much fun if all I was doing was mashing buttons.
Or wii sports ... or raving rabbids .... or mario kart ... or mario galaxy .. or ... or ..or ...or ... or ... the list goes on ...
justcallmebob
Posts: 979
Posted on: 17 Aug 10 17:05
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim107 View Post
Anyway, the real reason I think the Wii sucks is that you aren't using standard controllers. I find the motion control very annoying. It's harder to play games because you need to bring physical action into them. You can't just have the four main buttons at the tip of your thumb. I think that there's a reason the PS3 was made to use traditional controllers.
And that's why my daughters love playing games on the Wii. They play it more than the Xbox 360 or the PS2.

As mentioned before . . . it wouldn't be as much fun to bowl if all you did was press X and O.
troy512
Posts: 4283
Posted on: 20 Aug 10 08:05
slight interactive game play is the ploy and the plight.

this gives mass market advantage and core rebuttal.

all three consoles see this advantage.

only time will revel true interactive play as the future.

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.

About this category

Game Consoles

  • Game consoles have become more and more mainstream with the years. All of them allow you to play games, while some have the ability to play next-gen movie formats like Blu-ray, download content from the web, or enter social networks. Besides these consoles, there are portable consoles like the PSP and Nintendo DS.More about this
FAQsWhat is BD-Live?How to set up your Xbox 360 to act as a media server?

Most popular headlines

Diablo 3 game fans hit with always-online DRM grief (4)

  • Fri 18 May 20:04 by Seán
  • Software

it appears that Blizzard underestimated the server capacity required to handle all the gamers, thus resulting in Battle.net servers being overloaded and taken offline at launch. As Diablo III requires the user to be logged in with an uninterrupted internet connection to play, most players were greeted with an "Error 37" on the day of launch, unable to play the game.

CD Projekt says the truth is, DRM doesn't work (2)

  • Mon 21 May 22:48 by Seán
  • Piracy

In an interview between Forbes and CD Projekt CEO Marcin Iwinski, Iwinski said the truth is that DRM simply does not work. He said the main problem is that the copy protection is cracked within hours of the release of every game, not to mention the money and development wasted to implement it. Those with pirated versions also have a clean and more functional game!

Why not? PNY announces USB drive with whistle (10)

It could be possible that there is a scenario where you would have loved to be able to whistle on your USB stick, but we really wonder when. To make

FBI to start special service to spy on online communication (1)

Cnet claims that the FBI, the intellige

See all headlines

Active Commenters