Theater owners rejoice as Universal Pictures axes aggressive ‘Tower Heist’ VOD project
A heated tiff between the National Association of Theatre Owners and Universal Pictures has fizzled out. The movie studio quashed plans this week to bring its upcoming movie “Tower Heist” to the home video on-demand space less than a month after its big screen debut.
Universal reconsidered its pricey ploy (the VOD rental would have cost consumers $59) following boycott threats from Cinemark and strong criticism from NATO. Had the plan went through, “Tower Heist” would have been available to home viewers by the end of November. The crime caper, starring Ben Stiller and Eddie Murphy, is slated for release on November 4.
Following the announcement, NATO applauded the studio’s decision:
In response to Universal’s decision to cancel its planned release of Tower Heist to the home on Video on Demand just three weeks after its theatrical debut, National Association of Theatre Owners president and CEO John Fithian stated, “NATO would like to thank Universal for responding to various theater owners’ concerns and cancelling the PVOD test it was contemplating. They have been engaged with individual exhibitors on this test, and while it was something that many theater owners could not ultimately support, the open and collaborative nature of the dialogue is appreciated. NATO recognizes that studios need to find new models and opportunities in the home market, and looks forward to distributors and exhibitors working together for their mutual benefit.”
Universal hasn’t abandoned the experimental new medium altogether. The studio said that it “continues to believe that the theater experience and a PVOD window are business models that can coincide and thrive.” It declined to elaborate on future plans.
NATO has a history of fighting with movie companies over shortening on-demand windows. In April, members of the group even threatened to pull trailers for films tagged for premium VOD treatment. For now, the organization can chalk up Universal’s retreat as a small victory in an ongoing war over controlling how and when people watch new movies. (via TechDirt)
Is Universal’s decision a blessing in disguise? Would you even pay $60 to see a new film three weeks after its theatrical release? Share your thoughts in the comment section.
There are 4 comments
- MyCE Senior Member
- Posted on: 14 Oct 11 13:06
- Retired Moderator
- Posted on: 14 Oct 11 13:55
- New Member
- Posted on: 14 Oct 11 17:34
I can go to a movie with the wife and spend $14.00 on tickets.....maybe 25 on popcorn and pop and stuff......
or I can pay 59.00 to watch it at home....on a smaller screen, make my own popcorn.......fill my glass with my own pop......and run to the conveniance(sp?) store for whatever esle the wife wants (ie. minimints...etc....).
they're so out of touch.......what else can I say.....
- MyCE Rookie
- Posted on: 14 Oct 11 19:42
I would not pay $60. for a video rental. Nor for that matter would I pay $15. to sit in a theather to see the same movie, while being subjected to the usual idiots one encounters in theathers. Will wait for DVD thank you and watch it on my large screen hi-def screen in the confort of my own home.
Most popular headlines
- Tue 14 Oct 05:10 by DoMiN8ToR
The Chromium issue tracker has revealed a hidden gem today, a screenshot posted ...
- Fri 17 Oct 06:10 by DoMiN8ToR
Google today released the second version of Android L Preview. The latest versio...
- Mon 13 Oct 05:10 by DoMiN8ToR
Movie Panda, an application available for Windows and MacOSx streams more than 1...
- Tue 14 Oct 04:10 by DoMiN8ToR
The company iSIGHT and Microsoft have disclosed that a dangerous vulnerability e...
- Wed 15 Oct 05:10 by DoMiN8ToR
Google appears to have delisted all Android issues that were posted in the Chrom...