Verizon Wireless recently defended its decision to raise smartphone early termination fees, saying the increase is necessary as consumers pay less for their mobile devices.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) launched an official investigation into the matter after VZW increased its ETFs up to $350, citing several different reasons for the price increase.
“This pricing structure enables Verizon Wireless to offer wireless devices at a substantial discount from their full retail price,” Verizon wrote in its letter to the FCC. “By reducing up-front costs to consumers, this pricing lowers the barriers to consumers to obtaining mobile broadband devices. It thus enables more consumers, including those of more limited means, access to a range of exciting, state-of-the-art broadband services and capabilities.”

After years of complaining from mobile subscribers, the FCC in August launched a formal investigation into the big four wireless providers — Verizon, AT&T, Sprint-Nextel and T-Mobile — investigating SMS charges, hidden charges, ETFs, and other questionable business practices.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report that indicated ETFS were one of the top four criticisms consumers have against wireless providers.
I applaud the FCC for launching an investigation, but many consumers — including myself — feel that an investigation is meaningless if there are no punishments rendered.
Wireless providers should be able to dump a provider if service is spotty, or the company isn’t able to attract mobile phone manufacturers — AT&T’s 3G coverage, for example, has frustrated many consumers who are locked into two-year contracts. At the very least, companies should be required to clearly outline when and how consumers are able to get out of the ETFs, if there is a legitimate reason available.
In 2010 and beyond, I hope the FCC actually punishes the wireless industry when they work together to push around consumers. If not, an official investigation, regardless of how long it lasts, seems like a waste.
Similar posts:
- 17 Feb 10 Verizon Wireless introduces Skype Mobile edition
- 20 Jan 10 AT&T, VZW launch wireless plan price war
- 14 Jan 10 Verizon Wireless may force 3G data plans
- 25 Dec 09 FCC responds to Verizon’s letter
- 23 Dec 09 Verizon Wireless grilled for sneaky fees
2 Comments
In addition, once your 1 or 2 year commitment is up, shouldn't the wireless carrier drop your monthly rates? They are no longer trying to "recoup" costs for the phone subsidy, so it's all pure profit for them afterwards.
We need to see these type of competitive options, but the big wireless carriers don't want to do it because they're profits keep rising every year.
About this category
Mobile Phones
- Mobile phones started of with one main feature: calling. Through-out the years cameras, Bluetooth, OLED Touch Screens and GPS were added. All these new features created an amazing amount of clutter in the mobile phone market. To stay up-to-date on the latest mobile features, rumours and launches follow our mobile phone section. More about this
Most popular headlines
Sony's new ad mocks Wii, Xbox 360 (3)
- Sat 20 Mar 10:02 by Randomus
- Game Consoles
A week after publicly unveiling its PlayStation 3 Move motion controller at GDC, Sony has launch a new ad attacking the Microsoft Xbox 360 and Nintendo Wii game consoles.
Microsoft: PS3's Blu-ray is a burden (5)
- Thu 18 Mar 00:00 by JaredNewman
- Blu-Ray writers & players, Game Consoles
Microsoft's Xbox product director Aaron Greenberg said the Xbox 360's lack of a Blu-ray player has actually been crucial to the console's success.
Sony considers discontinuing the PSP Go (4)
- Thu 18 Mar 02:00 by Randomus
- Game Consoles
It's possible Sony will pull the plug on its struggling PSP Go mobile gaming unit, as it has become obvious the company dropped the ball a bit in the mobile gaming business.
Spain allows P2P, link-sharing of copyrighted works (10)
- Tue 16 Mar 05:00 by JaredNewman
- Piracy
As long as no profits are made, it's legal to share copyrighted material through peer-to-peer transfers or link to it through a Web site, a Spanish court ruled.

