The two causes on their own were noteworthy, but had weaknesses that kept them docile. WikiLeaks had controversy and the attention of mainstream media, but lacked muscle to defend themselves from oppressors. Operation Payback, on the other hand, had plenty of eager hackers at their disposal and a passion to fight for their internet freedoms, but couldn’t quite capture enough of the spotlight to grow and support their cause. Together, WikiLeaks and Operation Payback now have both the fire and fuel that are combining to form what is turning into an all-out cyber-war like nothing the world has witnessed before.

WikiLeaks began public operations by unknown founders in January of 2007, and immediately dove into their whistle-blowing ways with a threat to publish 1.2 million confidential documents they claimed to have. Their mission was defined as a “primary interest in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to be of assistance to people of all regions who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations.”
Over the years, more government agencies and corporations have turned against WikiLeaks due to allegations of espionage, however much of the public didn’t seem to take notice of the politically dissonant site until the site began leaking US diplomatic cables in late November 2010, while site representative Julian Assange appeared to be attempting to dodge rape allegations. Major corporations like PayPal and MasterCard cut off financial streams to the site operations, while EveryDNS and Amazon cut ties to their servers. It began to look like the site would succumb to the opposition.
Operation Payback just began three months ago, when Indian software firm Aiplex was hired by the Motion Picture Association of America to help combat piracy by launching a series of DDoS attacks against BitTorrent sites, including The Pirate Bay. Anonymous, a group of hackers loosely affiliated with website 4Chan, launched their own DDoS attack on Aiplex and the MPAA in retaliation. After that, they made it their mission to strike the website of any organization or individual who dared to appear in the media speaking out against file sharing. Victims included the RIAA, US Copyright office, and several law firms who represent record labels and production companies in file-sharing lawsuits.
Then this week, Operation Payback decided that WikiLeaks “freedom of information” platform so closely resembled their own that they should begin to fight for that cause as well as their own. So far, Anonymous has launched DDoS attacks upon PayPal, MasterCard, and Assange’s Swiss bank. Meanwhile, Pirate Parties around the world have begun helping WikiLeaks stay online by hosting over 300 mirrors of the site on their servers. The site now has so much strength that analysts are saying that even if the site ends up shutting down in the future, “bits and pieces of its content will probably be mirrored forever,” on the Internet.
“While we don’t have much of an affiliation with WikiLeaks, we fight for the same reasons,” Anonymous said in a statement on its website. “We want transparency and we counter censorship. … This is why we intend to utilize our resources to raise awareness, attack those against and support those who are helping lead our world to freedom and democracy.”
The group is now conducting what they have dubbed “Operation Avenge Assange.” The operation consists of the following”
* Offer WikiLeaks an additional mirror and have it Googlebombed.
* Create counter-propaganda, organizing attacks (DDoS) on various targets related to censorship (time, date and target will be published by that time).
* Contact media entities, inform them that Operation:Payback has come out in support of Wikileaks, and has declared war on the entities involved in censoring there information; we will seek public support in a campaign against censorship.
* We will find and will attack those who stand against WikiLeaks and we will support WikiLeaks in everything they need.
But these types of attacks go both ways, and today it appears that there are a number of sites that have become casualties in this cyber-war. Operation Payback’s website, Anonops.net, appears to have been hijacked at the time this article was started, with the following message appearing on their homepage: “This Account Has Been Suspended for the following reason : Furfaggotary.”. Now, the website displays a generic default page with the text “If you feel you have reached this page in error, please contact the web site owner”.
Today, Sarah Palin became the latest target of Operation Avenge Assange as Anonymous hackers out of London disrupted her website and have even reportedly compromised her personal credit card accounts after she referred to Assange as “an anti-American operative with blood on his hands.”
Anonymous also targeted and successfully brought down the websites for Mastercard and Visa today using their infamous DDoS attacks.
And this is only the beginning. With the realization from WikiLeak’s published US Cables that China had ordered cyber-attacks on Google, there is no telling how many corporations and government entities could end up getting involved in this mess before it ends.
Cyberwarfare is defined by government security expert Richard A. Clarke, in his book Cyber War, as “actions by a nation-state to penetrate another nation’s computers or networks for the purposes of causing damage or disruption.” It is quite clear that we have reached that state.
15 Comments
I wonder what this will mean for the little country.
| I wonder what this will mean for the little country. |
There is a lot of hypocrisy.
Assange is the biggest hypocrite of all.
He walks off interviews when asked questions. As long as the information is not about him, then it's O.K.. There is a bullet with his name on it. Except for naming sensitive areas, I haven't read much that surprises me at all. The stupidity of my (U.S.) governments handling of secret material is the most shocking, but not unexpected.
I wonder how people would feel if Wikileaks put up information on how to make weapons of mass destruction, i.e. the ingredients and technique for making Sarin gas, the full and complete instructions of how to make a nuclear weapon, and places where stolen Uranium fuel rods could be purchased .
I find it amusing that people think they have the right to know anything they want to. I have worked for the government. I have worked on X-craft at Sikorsky Aircraft. There are some things that just not anybody's business. If these attacks are coming from one country, then maybe that country should experience a complete denial of service on a grand scale. Why not show them how it is really done. The actions border on state run terrorists attacks, if it is allowed to continue with impunity. These groups are cyber terrorists. Why should I have trouble dealing with whomever I wish ( i.e. MasterCard, which I did not but others have had trouble, their technique was ineffective) because these idiots decide to decide for me. If an individual wishes to protest fine. When they organize to do crime, they are called organized crime. They have taken much upon themselves. They deserve what they have coming to them.P.S. Watch this thread now die.
|
Zathros, you seem ill informed. Wikileaks does not just publish US leaked documents, other countries have had many of their documents leaked also. People leak documents to Wikileaks because they are usually exposing government fraud, misdeeds, lies and the like. It is Wikileaks policy not to leak documents that put people in danger (in this they may have failed, but to date I have not heard of it). The biggest reason your government and the other governments of the world are upset, is because they are embarrassed by their own actions. When the public eye of scrutiny is put upon the crimes committed by your government, and other countries governments as well, their only recourse is to try and discredit the source... but they can't discredit their own documents. Wikileaks does not publish documents that tell people how to make terrorist weapons, but there are plenty of places on the internet that do, just Google it, the information is out there, wake up.
|

Be careful what you Google. There are Cray computers that monitor the chatter for certain key words. You ISP is instantly noted. It doesn't matter what country you are from.
|
I know when my rights as a human being are eroding, I know when I sacrifice freedom for security, I know that no source is perfectly accurate, and I also know we need more accountability in our governments. Wikileaks is one conduit for that kind of change.
|
I wish I knew where you were from. It is obvious that I am from the U.S.. Maybe your rights are being eroded. I doubt that is because of anything the U.S has done. Of course, not knowing where you are from makes this kind of conversation impossible. I can tell you, in 1967, I had to sit in the back of the bus, because of my skin tone. I have suffered much, very much racism from of what society calls white people (which to me is a racist term), not exclusively though. On the other hand, I have made my way rather well and I have found the same goes on everywhere, as I have traveled abroad and seen it and experienced it for myself, especially in England, not knocking England as the experience may have been 20% bad but the 80% good endeared me to that country. While I may have suffered from racism, and my country sucked in the '60's (on another level it was great though), I still love my country and try to make it better by the part I offer. That is all one can do anyways. It is the only freedom we really have, regardless of where and when.
Not knowing problems is a dangerous one, because you cannot really act on what you do not know.
Ignoring problems can be even more dangerous, because you might know (agree it exists), but chose not to act upon it. It can also be compeltely the right choice to do.
Downsizing problems might be beneficial for one group, but an outright violation of rights for another group.
-------------
If not even once a person with a different skin color would try to tell all the people with another skin color that they are both equal human beings, you would and could not ever had a problem with racism., despite your thoughts about it. You might never had known there was a problem to begin with.
If not even once a person with a different skin color would agree with the fact that people with another skin color are equal human beings, racism would have kept on going forever, everywhere.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11967664
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11965864
|
Not knowing, ignoring or downsizing problems that might cause great impact in a society does not mean everything is ok.
Not knowing problems is a dangerous one, because you cannot really act on what you do not know. Ignoring problems can be even more dangerous, because you might know (agree it exists), but chose not to act upon it. It can also be compeltely the right choice to do. Downsizing problems might be beneficial for one group, but an outright violation of rights for another group. ------------- If not even once a person with a different skin color would try to tell all the people with another skin color that they are both equal human beings, you would and could not ever had a problem with racism., despite your thoughts about it. You might never had known there was a problem to begin with. If not even once a person with a different skin color would agree with the fact that people with another skin color are equal human beings, racism would have kept on going forever, everywhere. |
I just found some very nice video of a guy we could all learn something from.
About this category
Piracy
- The constant fight against, or enjoyment of pirated movies, music albums and games can be found here. This news channel brings the latest on law suits that are piracy related, busted duplicators and P2P services. More about this
Most popular headlines
Diablo 3 game fans hit with always-online DRM grief (4)
- Fri 18 May 20:04 by Seán
- Software
it appears that Blizzard underestimated the server capacity required to handle all the gamers, thus resulting in Battle.net servers being overloaded and taken offline at launch. As Diablo III requires the user to be logged in with an uninterrupted internet connection to play, most players were greeted with an "Error 37" on the day of launch, unable to play the game.
CD Projekt says the truth is, DRM doesn't work (2)
- Mon 21 May 22:48 by Seán
- Piracy
In an interview between Forbes and CD Projekt CEO Marcin Iwinski, Iwinski said the truth is that DRM simply does not work. He said the main problem is that the copy protection is cracked within hours of the release of every game, not to mention the money and development wasted to implement it. Those with pirated versions also have a clean and more functional game!
FBI to start special service to spy on online communication (1)
- Thu 24 May 10:11 by DoMiN8ToR
- Computers
Cnet claims that the FBI, the intellige
Why not? PNY announces USB drive with whistle (10)
- Wed 23 May 11:48 by DoMiN8ToR
- Uncategorized
It could be possible that there is a scenario where you would have loved to be able to whistle on your USB stick, but we really wonder when. To make


