Pioneer DVR-110D DVD Burner Review

Author

Dee
Senior Administrator and Reviewer
Article posted 07 Oct 05 19:01

Conclusion

Positive:


  • Very good writing quality on most media
  • Supports DVD±R/+R DL/-R DL writing at 16x/8x/8x
  • Supports CD-RW writing at 32x
  • Can write DVD±R/±R DL certified media at higher speed
  • Can write selected DVD±R at higher than the media’s rated speed
  • Supports bitsetting for DVD+R DL (sets auto. booktype to DVD-ROM)
  • Can read Pressed DVD-Video/DVD-ROM SL/DL at 16x/12x
  • ‘Two sheep” writer
  • Good build quality
  • Supports DAO-RAW writing
  • Supports Mini DVD-R/RW discs
  • Can read VCD at full speed
  • The drive runs very quietly

Negative:


  • Does not support Mt. Rainier
  • Many DVD±R media burns at lower than its rated speed
  • 40x media compatibility on CD-R could been improved
  • Reads SL and DL DVD±R discs at only 12x/8x
  • Can’t read CD/CD-R/CD-RW media above 40x/40x/32x
  • No bitsetting support (Booktype – DVD-ROM) on DVD+R/RW media
  • Can’t overburn CD-R media
  • Can not rip ‘Key2Audio V3″  & Cactus 100 protected audio discs
  • DAE performance needs to be improved
  • Not a ‘lead free” product

Conclusion:


Let us summarize the most important positive and negative points below:

The main positive points: The Pioneer DVR-110D is the world’s first burner to support 8x write speed on DVD-R DL media. The DVR-110D can also write most DVD-R media with very good quality. This can be witnessed from our test results on DVD-R media.

The DVR-110D can write most DVD+R media with excellent quality; again this can be witnessed from the test results obtained during our write tests with DVD+R media. The DVR-110D can also write CD-R and CD-RW with very good quality, with some media (Taiyo Yuden and Verbatim) for example, the results are awesome.

The DVR-110D can burn a few selected DVD±R media at higher than the media’s rated speed, and still obtain good burn quality. The DVR-110D can also rip pressed DVD-Video at 16x SL and 12x DL, and pressed DVD-ROM’s at 16x. This makes the drive a useful DVD-Video ripping tool.

The Pioneer DVR-110D can burn Double Layer media quickly, and in most cases with good quality. This drive handled some DL media with good quality that many other drives struggle with.

Another thing worth a mention is the drive runs fairly quietly, and runs cool. This may be important in some environments, especially if the drive is housed in a cramped PC case or a hot climate. The DVR-110D feels solidly built, the tray has a nice solid feel to its action, and the whole drive has a feel of good build quality.

The main negative points: The DVR110D writes many DVD±R media at lower than its rated speed. This is particularly noticeable with 16x rated media where the drive can only manage 12x and 8x and in some cases only 4x. Hopefully this can be improved with future firmware updates. The same scenario can be applied to CD-R media, where many discs are burned at lower than their rated speed.

Bitsetting on DVD+R and DVD+RW media to set Booktype to DVD-ROM would be nice, as this would increase compatibility with set top DVD players, especially older models.

Read speed on DVD±R is locked at 12x. We would like to see this speed increased to 16x with future firmware updates. CD/CD-R read speed is also slightly slow at 40x, once again we would like to see the read speed increased to 48x for those types of media.

The DVR-110D did not perform well in our DAE tests. The extraction quality was excellent, but the drive failed the ‘copy on the fly” tests at speeds over 4x. Perhaps this can be sorted with a future firmware update. The DVR-110D also had problems reading some of our ‘protected audio discs” This perhaps is not such a great problem these days, as very few new audio CD’s are protected in my experience.

The DVR-110D failed our CD-R ‘overburn tests” meaning this drive would not be suitable for burning 90 minute or 99 minute CD-R media.

We would like to mention that this DVD burner is not a “lead-free” product,
and does not meet the recycling standards that will come into effect on the
1st of January 2006
.

To sum it all up: The Pioneer DVR-110D drive is certainly a capable performer when it comes to burning DVD±R/RW and CD-R/RW media. Of course, many of us will buy a DVD burner to write recordable media. In this case the drive will not disappoint. If we were being critical, then media compatibility could be improved, with more 16x media being burned at its rated speed.

When it comes to reading performance, then this drive is a bit of an enigma. DVD ripping performance on pressed DVD-Video and DVD-ROM is excellent. Yet, when it comes to reading DVD±R and CD-R/RW media, the drive is a tad slow by today’s standards.

Overall, the DVR110D is a good drive, but needs improving in certain areas.

By using our CD Freaks price grabber feature we found the Pioneer DVR-110D drive is listed at $44.99 (September 2005).

You may comment on this review below or in this forum thread

Thanks to:


Bell Technology spol s.r.o. ‘“ Czech Republic for providing the media used in this review.

SVP Communication ‘“ The United Kingdom for providing the media used in this review.

Conrexx Technology B.V./RITEK Europe ‘“ The Netherlands for providing the media used in this review.

Medea International ‘“ United Kingdom for providing the media used in this review

Ricoh Europe ‘“ For providing the media used in this review.


E-Net Distribution ‘“ United Kingdom for providing the media used in this review.



MMORE International B.V. – The Netherlands for providing the media used in this review.

 

 

Verbatim - Germany and United Kingdom for providing the media used in this review.

For providing the Memorex media used in this review. Memorex is one of the largest providers of all types of media for larger parts of the world.

26 Comments

lui_gough
Posts: 1253
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 09:47
Fix the spelling -> RICOH JNP? it's JPN! Overburning -> not that it doesn't overburn CD-R, its that it cannot overburn past 89mins.
_chef_
Posts: 29852
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 10:03
I'd say it needs to be clarified what's called overburning on what rated media...
lordyu
Posts: 265
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 23:30
For (much) better quality and (much) smaller file size, use PNG for screenshots or screen captures. JPG/JPEG is for photos.
[edited by lordyu on 08.10.2005 23:31]
eddiechi
Posts: 4
Posted on: 12 Dec 05 17:44
What is the difference between this review and the one done on Pioneer DVR-110 DVD on 02 December 2005... anything besides the firmware? The updated firmware seems to make this a much better unit comparing the two reviews....
digit010
Posts: 35
Posted on: 08 Nov 06 04:43
:r This software once had one of the best reputations as the leading software for burning.I used to use it myself for ALL my burning needs.Since it has become bloated,slower and many have encountered bugs that appear in near enough all new releases,it is no longer what I and I'm sure many others would recommend to use.There are now other burning tools available for free that make Nero look much less appealing.
Kiltedwolf
Posts: 1
Posted on: 17 Dec 06 00:45
This piece of "bloatware" has been the standard and still is as far as burning is concerned. There are lots of copy software out there, but having been using this software and others for about 8 years now, there are none finer as long as you're not looking to copy protected content. If that's what you're trying to do, then of course you're going to use something else! This program does have lighter versions if you don't want all the "bloat". The core program is still as stellar as ever. I applaud Ahead branching out and creating very useful other programs. As somebody who works in digital media, I can tell you that when you need to do some editing and you don't have a decent pay editor, it can come in quite handy! Nero is still my "baby" when it comes to disk burning!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 22 Jul 07 10:59
It used to be da $hit! too many bugs, and loaded with junk software. try imgburn for isos, and freeware for data. nero u suck!
Ms.Dusty
Posts: 4
Posted on: 11 Feb 08 17:21
I like and will keep the 7 but, I have to agree, the new Nero has lost alot of it's ease Good thing with rebates the Nero 8 I bought comes out to cost me $0.00
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 23 Feb 08 21:43
Nero 7 was bundled with my new CD/DVD burner. It is almost certainly the worst s/w I have encountered in 20 years. I am amazed that they can even give it away.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 14 Jul 08 16:05
meh it does basics
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 17 Jul 08 09:48
hahah tang ina nyo..! mga hayup kau...!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 27 Aug 08 14:35
In their quest to become bigger and better, Ahead has shot themselves in the foot. Once *the* burning software to have, it is now nothing but crap filled with useless additives that do nothing but slow it down and ruin itself. The post from Kiltedwolf cracks me up. There's always someone out there willing to point the finger at someone else accusing them of pirating or cheating. Truth be told, that dipshit probably works for Ahead. Anyway, if you want something that will slow your rig down, confuse you with extra junk that's not needed, and pretty pricey then get the latest Nero.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 02 Sep 08 16:06
:d :+ very bad
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 05 Sep 08 18:33
www.forexoptical.com
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Oct 08 14:23
can i delete the files from cd,in nero 8.0
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 09 Oct 08 20:07
peah this is a bullshit.it is to slow and also slowing down computer performance
mrwul
Posts: 13
Posted on: 01 Nov 08 17:59
why is it then - in reviews they rank up as best... ? frankly, for me, a top of the bill burner is sufficient, i donot need all the extra's .. but then again, as said, they rank up as one of the best..
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 13 Nov 08 11:41
Nero is crap. I have burnt one successful data cd out of 35 attempts.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 23 Nov 08 11:29
the latest release took me about 45 minutes to install with a couple of restarts in between!!! WTF!!! installing XP takes that much time!!!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 25 Nov 08 21:42
Nero 7 Is a joke. Won't even go higher based on these posts! Thank you! Bought a new Samsung external dvd burner & Nero Tru-Ware just plain sucks!! Craps out at the end but it took an hour to get their. What a waste of time :r :c
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Dec 08 02:51
How do I COMPLETELY remove every last trace of this horrific software from my computer? The trial version SUCKED and has left behind many files that seem irremovable. Please help!!!
firestormbringer
Posts: 1
Posted on: 06 Dec 08 20:05
On its own - Nero is so-so, but use it with DVD Shrink 3.2 and it sings ! :d
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 08 Dec 08 23:09
nero killed my burning and virtual devices and to make it worse, i couldnt uninstall it. it trashed my p.c no amount of reg cleaning or fixes or uninstalling all the burning helped nor did a repair install, dont want to be rude but thanks for nothing the software that came with my dvd shouldnt kill my p.c.. :c :c !!!
totalz
Posts: 299
Posted on: 10 Dec 08 06:04
After installing, 12 more system restore sections... :r
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 20 Dec 08 00:01
I looked for a free upgrade of old Nero 6.0.+ v., and started from Nero-8. in the 1-st install shield screen was displayed as Trial version. So I continued with 7.0. There I not found ANY mention about kind of version, it proposed to uninstall an old v. (which had a critical crash bug!), but finally appeared a title "Trial version" ... Boorish! I finished with Nero.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 02 Jan 09 10:27
:d :r ke nn funziona .nrg

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.