Pioneer DVR-110D DVD Burner Review

Author

Dee
Senior Administrator and Reviewer
Article posted 07 Oct 05 19:01

DVD+R DL/-R DL Writing performance

 

DVD+R/-R Double Layer writing speed and compatibility:


The Pioneer DVR-110D supports the DVD+R DL/-R DL standard for writing Double Layer/Dual Layer discs with a size around 8.5 GB at a writing speed of 8x. Let us first take a look at the media’s we will use:

Let’s find the manufacturer and media information too, for this we will use CD-Speed:

This media is manufactured by Mitsubishi Kagaku Media. Thanks to Verbatim (D) for sending us this media.

The media is made by Ricoh Co. Ltd. (Made in Taiwan).  Thanks to Ricoh Europe (Germany) for sending us this media.

The Traxdata media is manufactured by RITEK (Thanks to Conrexx (NL) for sending us this media).

The media is made by CMC Magnetics. Thanks to E-Net (UK) for sending us this media.

Testing procedure:
We created an ISO Image from a pre-authored DVD-Video compliant file set, with a total on-disc size of 8146 MB. We then wrote this image file using Nero Burning ROM 6. Below are the results:


Ricoh Media

Nero reported a successful burn with the Ricoh media in 45 minutes 13 seconds.



Traxdata media

Nero once again reported a successful burn with the Traxdata media in 45 minutes 29 seconds


Verbatim media

Nero once again completed the burn successfully with the Verbatim media in 18 minutes and 4 seconds.


DataWrite Media

Another successful burn with the DataWrite media in 45 minutes 15 seconds

Let us take a look at the K-Probe results:

Brand:

Ricoh ‘“ Thanks to Ricoh Europe (D) for providing the sample.

Manufacturer:

Ricoh Co. Ltd.

Code:

RICOH JPN D00

Disc Type:

DVD+R DL

Capacity:

8145MB

Certified Speed:

2.4x

Write Speed:

2.4x

Write Time:

45m:13s

PI-8 errors Average/Sec:

5.51

PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec:

0.10

The Ricoh media has performed very well. A very good result.

PI levels are high with the Traxdata media but within specification, PIF levels are quite reasonable for this media, there is a cluster of PIF errors at the layer break, this was a little concerning.

Brand:

Verbatim ‘“ Thanks to Verbatim (D) for providing the sample.

Manufacturer:

Mitsubishi Kagaku Media

Code:

MKM 001

Disc Type:

DVD+R DL

Capacity:

8145MB

Certified Speed:

2.4x

Write Speed:

8x

Write Time:

18m:04s

PI-8 errors Average/Sec:

2.16

PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec:

0.04

The result is very good, considering this 2.4x certified media was written at 8x. There is a single PIF spike of 7 near the beginning of the disc, but this should not cause concern.

Brand:

DataWrite ‘“ Thanks to E-Net (UK) for providing this media.

Manufacturer:

CMC Magnetics

Code:

CMC MAG D01

Disc Type:

DVD+R DL

Capacity:

8145MB

Certified Speed:

2.4x

Write Speed:

2.4x

Write Time:

45m:15s

PI-8 errors Average/Sec:

4.39

PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec:

0.08

The DataWrite media has performed very well, and once again we have a very good result.

Now it’s time to take a look at some reading tests with various DVD-Writers.

First we will try to read the discs back in the Pioneer DVR-110D:


Ricoh Media


Traxdata media



Verbatim Media


DataWrite media

As we can see, the Pioneer DVR-110D had no problems reading the discs.

Now let us try NEC ND-3540A drive to read the Double Layer discs:


Ricoh Media


Traxdata media



Verbatim Media


DataWrite media

The NEC ND-3540A had no problems reading the discs apart from a slowdown at the layer break with the Verbatim and Traxdata media.

Let’s compare the Pioneer DVR-110D with some other DL capable drives.

Drive

Size

Writing
Speed

Writing
Time

Book
Type

Kprobe
avg.
PI

Kprobe
avg.
PIF

Aopen
1608/ARR

8103 MB

2.4x

44m:01s

DVD-ROM

4.12

0.12

Mad Dog
MD-16XDVD9

8131 MB

4x

26m:44s

DVD-ROM

2.74

0.12

LG
GSA-4163B

8103 MB

4x
2.4x

26m:55s
44m:30s

DVD-ROM

1.81
16.01

0.01
0.03*2

Lite-On
SHOW-1653S

8152 MB

4x

27m:09s

DVD-ROM

2.61

0.15

LG
GSA-5160D

8103 MB

2.4x

44m:25s
44m:41s

DVD-ROM

2.19
18.63

0.04
0.04*2

ASUS
DRW-1604P

8131 MB

4x

26m:58s

DVD-ROM

3.29

0.18

Samsung
TS-E522U

8103MB

6x
Z-CLV

23m:30s

DVD+DL

11.58

0.03*1

Philips
DVDR16LS

8103MB

2.4x

45m:52s

DVD-ROM

2.28

0.04*

NU
HDW-164

8103MB

4x

37m:00s

DVD-ROM

1.89

0.02*1

NEC
ND-3540A

8103MB

2.4x
2.4x
8x

44m:08s
44m:03s
19m:02

DVD-ROM

37.44
12.36
1.91

0.02*3
0.02*2
0.01*1

BenQ
DW1640

8152Mb

8x

15m:36s

DVD-ROM

3.26

0.02

Pioneer
DVR-110D


8145MB

2.4x
2.4x
8x
2.4x

45m:13s
45m:29s
18m:04s
45m:15s

DVD-ROM

5.51
20.45
2.16
4.39

0.10*3
0.23*2
0.04*1
0.08*4

*1 Verbatim DVD+R DL
*2 Traxdata DVD+R DL
*3 Ricoh DVD+R DL
*4 DataWrite DVD+R DL

DVD-R DL

As mentioned in the beginning of this page, the Pioneer DVR-110D supports the DVD-R DL standard at 8x. Let us first take a look at the media we will use:

Let’s find the manufacturer and media information too, for this we will use CD-Speed 4.04:

This media is manufactured by Mitsubishi Kagaku Media. Thanks to SVP (UK) for sending us this media.

Again, we used Nero Burning Rom 6 to write the DVD Image:

The Pioneer used 18 minutes and 12 seconds to write the Verbatim DVD-R DL 4x media at 8x.

To check the disc quality we used the NEC ND-3540A along with CD-Speed. The result is for information purposes only and cannot be compared to the Lite-On scans.

Brand:

Verbatim ‘“ Thanks to Verbatim (UK) for providing the sample.

Manufacturer:

Mitsubishi Kagaku Media

Code:

MKM 01RD30 

Disc Type:

DVD-R DL

Capacity:

8145MB

Certified Speed:

4x

Write Speed:

8x

Write Time:

18m:12s

PI-8 errors Average/Sec:

32.79

PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec:

0.09

We will now check the read-back curves on three different drives.

Excellent read-back curves. Despite the poor CD-Speed disc quality scan. We would have to conclude the disc is ok since it read back in our three drives with excellent results.

Standalone DVD-Player compatibility:


We only have 3 standalone DVD-Players available and 1 standalone DVD-RAM DVD-R recorder to test the DVD+R DL medias (Book Type: DVD-ROM) and the DVD-R DL media (Book Type: DVD-R):

  • Panasonic DVD-RV32
  • Panasonic SA-HT520
  • Proline DVDP350
  • Panasonic DMR-E50 recorder

Compatibility results: 

Drive

Ricoh
DVD+R DL

DataWrite
DVD+R DL

Verbatim
DVD+R DL

Verbatim
DVD-R DL

Comments

Panasonic
DVD-RV32

OK

OK

OK

OK

No problems.

Panasonic
SA-HT520

OK

OK

OK

FAILED

Plays the first layer but fails at the layer-break.

Panasonic
DMR-E50

OK

OK

OK

FAILED

Reports ?NO DISC?.  

Proline DVDP350
230G

OK

OK

OK

FAILED

Reports no valid disc

All DVD Standalone devices played the Pioneer DVR-110D burned DVD+R DL media. But only one DVD Standalone device would play the Pioneer DVR-110D burned DVD-R DL media without any problems.

Summary: Very good quality on DVD+R DL/-R DL and DVD standalone compatibility results, for the DVD+R DL media.

Before we round off this review, let us run the drive through some advanced tests at next page…


26 Comments

lui_gough
Posts: 1253
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 09:47
Fix the spelling -> RICOH JNP? it's JPN! Overburning -> not that it doesn't overburn CD-R, its that it cannot overburn past 89mins.
_chef_
Posts: 29852
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 10:03
I'd say it needs to be clarified what's called overburning on what rated media...
lordyu
Posts: 265
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 23:30
For (much) better quality and (much) smaller file size, use PNG for screenshots or screen captures. JPG/JPEG is for photos.
[edited by lordyu on 08.10.2005 23:31]
eddiechi
Posts: 4
Posted on: 12 Dec 05 17:44
What is the difference between this review and the one done on Pioneer DVR-110 DVD on 02 December 2005... anything besides the firmware? The updated firmware seems to make this a much better unit comparing the two reviews....
digit010
Posts: 35
Posted on: 08 Nov 06 04:43
:r This software once had one of the best reputations as the leading software for burning.I used to use it myself for ALL my burning needs.Since it has become bloated,slower and many have encountered bugs that appear in near enough all new releases,it is no longer what I and I'm sure many others would recommend to use.There are now other burning tools available for free that make Nero look much less appealing.
Kiltedwolf
Posts: 1
Posted on: 17 Dec 06 00:45
This piece of "bloatware" has been the standard and still is as far as burning is concerned. There are lots of copy software out there, but having been using this software and others for about 8 years now, there are none finer as long as you're not looking to copy protected content. If that's what you're trying to do, then of course you're going to use something else! This program does have lighter versions if you don't want all the "bloat". The core program is still as stellar as ever. I applaud Ahead branching out and creating very useful other programs. As somebody who works in digital media, I can tell you that when you need to do some editing and you don't have a decent pay editor, it can come in quite handy! Nero is still my "baby" when it comes to disk burning!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 22 Jul 07 10:59
It used to be da $hit! too many bugs, and loaded with junk software. try imgburn for isos, and freeware for data. nero u suck!
Ms.Dusty
Posts: 4
Posted on: 11 Feb 08 17:21
I like and will keep the 7 but, I have to agree, the new Nero has lost alot of it's ease Good thing with rebates the Nero 8 I bought comes out to cost me $0.00
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 23 Feb 08 21:43
Nero 7 was bundled with my new CD/DVD burner. It is almost certainly the worst s/w I have encountered in 20 years. I am amazed that they can even give it away.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 14 Jul 08 16:05
meh it does basics
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 17 Jul 08 09:48
hahah tang ina nyo..! mga hayup kau...!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 27 Aug 08 14:35
In their quest to become bigger and better, Ahead has shot themselves in the foot. Once *the* burning software to have, it is now nothing but crap filled with useless additives that do nothing but slow it down and ruin itself. The post from Kiltedwolf cracks me up. There's always someone out there willing to point the finger at someone else accusing them of pirating or cheating. Truth be told, that dipshit probably works for Ahead. Anyway, if you want something that will slow your rig down, confuse you with extra junk that's not needed, and pretty pricey then get the latest Nero.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 02 Sep 08 16:06
:d :+ very bad
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 05 Sep 08 18:33
www.forexoptical.com
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Oct 08 14:23
can i delete the files from cd,in nero 8.0
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 09 Oct 08 20:07
peah this is a bullshit.it is to slow and also slowing down computer performance
mrwul
Posts: 13
Posted on: 01 Nov 08 17:59
why is it then - in reviews they rank up as best... ? frankly, for me, a top of the bill burner is sufficient, i donot need all the extra's .. but then again, as said, they rank up as one of the best..
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 13 Nov 08 11:41
Nero is crap. I have burnt one successful data cd out of 35 attempts.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 23 Nov 08 11:29
the latest release took me about 45 minutes to install with a couple of restarts in between!!! WTF!!! installing XP takes that much time!!!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 25 Nov 08 21:42
Nero 7 Is a joke. Won't even go higher based on these posts! Thank you! Bought a new Samsung external dvd burner & Nero Tru-Ware just plain sucks!! Craps out at the end but it took an hour to get their. What a waste of time :r :c
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Dec 08 02:51
How do I COMPLETELY remove every last trace of this horrific software from my computer? The trial version SUCKED and has left behind many files that seem irremovable. Please help!!!
firestormbringer
Posts: 1
Posted on: 06 Dec 08 20:05
On its own - Nero is so-so, but use it with DVD Shrink 3.2 and it sings ! :d
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 08 Dec 08 23:09
nero killed my burning and virtual devices and to make it worse, i couldnt uninstall it. it trashed my p.c no amount of reg cleaning or fixes or uninstalling all the burning helped nor did a repair install, dont want to be rude but thanks for nothing the software that came with my dvd shouldnt kill my p.c.. :c :c !!!
totalz
Posts: 299
Posted on: 10 Dec 08 06:04
After installing, 12 more system restore sections... :r
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 20 Dec 08 00:01
I looked for a free upgrade of old Nero 6.0.+ v., and started from Nero-8. in the 1-st install shield screen was displayed as Trial version. So I continued with 7.0. There I not found ANY mention about kind of version, it proposed to uninstall an old v. (which had a critical crash bug!), but finally appeared a title "Trial version" ... Boorish! I finished with Nero.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 02 Jan 09 10:27
:d :r ke nn funziona .nrg

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.