Pioneer DVR-110D DVD Burner Review

Author

Dee
Senior Administrator and Reviewer
Article posted 07 Oct 05 19:01

Reading performance

 

Reading performance:


For these tests we will use Nero CD/DVD-Speed to read various CD and DVD’s, including audio discs and DVD-media. As already mentioned in the introduction, this drive supports:

  • DVD-ROM : 16x
  • CD-ROM : 40x 

Pressed discs:

For this test we used a pressed CD-ROM disc containing the Roxio Media Creator 7 install CD that is close to 75 minutes in length. Below you will see the produced result:

The Pioneer DVR-110D reached 41.99x which is beyond its stated read speed of 40x, and will reach faster speeds on a full disc. Let’s compare the result in the table below:

Pressed
Discs

Average
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

Samsung
TS-H552B

35.65x

20.40x

47.22x

96ms

102ms

172ms

Philips
ED16DVDR

35.69x

20.59x

47.25x

118ms

130ms

206ms

Memorex
F16

34.94x

20.05x

46.33x

122ms

130ms

221ms

AOpen
DUW1608/ARR

37.34x

21.29x

49.42x

105ms

118ms

196ms

LG
GSA-5163D

30.73x

16.88x

40.47x

108ms

105ms

128ms

Lite-On
SOHW-1673S

36.44x

21.36x

48.13x

118ms

133ms

207ms

Pioneer
DVR-109D

30.77x

18.18x

24.51x

96ms

110ms

182ms

BenQ
DW1625

30.74x

15.39x

38.87x

99ms

112ms

161ms

NEC
ND-3540A

34.82x

19.88x

46.09x

122ms

132ms

210ms

BenQ
DW1640

36.58x

20.82x

47.67x

107ms

123ms

175ms

Pioneer
DVR-110D

31.61

18.09

41.99

99ms

111ms

189ms

The Pioneer DVR-110D performed average reading pressed CD-ROM.

* Some drives including the NU HDW-164 will simply execute the seek command without actually moving the pickup.

CD-Recordable Discs:

For this test we made a copy of the original Roxio Media Creator 7 install CD. The disc we used was a Ricoh 52X certified CD-R disc manufactured by Moser Baer India. 

CD-R
Discs

Average 
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

Philips
ED16DVDR

36.54x

21.46x

48.14x

124ms

151ms

230ms

AOpen
DUW1608/ARR

36.49x

21.20x

48.11x

99ms

115ms

185ms

LG
GSA-4163B

30.63x

17.62x

40.14x

105ms

129ms

183ms

Lite-On
SHOW-1653S

36.63x

21.46x

48.29x

125ms

157ms

234ms

LG
GSA-5160D

30.53x

16.83x

40.27x

116ms

118ms

128ms

ASUS
DRW-1604P

30.96x

18.26x

40.81x

125ms

143ms

282ms

Samsung
TS-E552U

36.65x

21.28x

48.33x

92ms

95ms

163ms

Philips
DVDR16LS

30.69x

17.68x

40.44x

126ms

137ms

175ms

NU
HDW-164

32.20x

18.48x

42.65

N/A*

N/A*

N/A*

NEC
ND-3540A

35.68x

20.76x

47.06x

128ms

130ms

213ms

BenQ
DW1640

36.57x

20.92x

48.09x

203ms

233ms

239ms

Pioneer
DVR-110D

31.18x

18.37x

40.99

111ms

121ms

204ms

Again the Pioneer DVR-110D performed around average on CD-R read test.

* Some drives including the NU HDW-164 will simply execute the seek command without actually moving the pickup.

 CD-Rewritable discs:

Again, we made a copy of the original Roxio Media Creator 7 install CD; this time we used a Verbatim Ultra Speed (32X) CD-RW disc made by Mitsubishi Chemicals Corporation.

As we can see above, the Pioneer DVR-110D is locked at 32x, reading CD-RW; now let us compare it to other drives below.

CD-RW
Discs

Average 
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

Philips
ED16DVDR

23.81x

13.97x

31.39x

122ms

156ms

232ms

Aopen
DUW1608/ARR

36.55x

21.31z

48.22x

102ms

114ms

185ms

LG
GSA-4163B

30.64x

17.69x

40.56x

105ms

127ms

180ms

Lite-On
SOHW-1653S

24.25x

14.04x

32.15x

129ms

167ms

233ms

LG
GSA-5160D

30.54x

16.59x

40.43x

119ms

116ms

129ms

ASUS
DRW-1604P

25.32x

14.63x

33.52x

129ms

149ms

288ms

Samsung
TS-E552U

23.99x

14.02x

31.63x

86ms

95ms

162ms

Philips
DVDR16LS

30.70x

17.71x

40.55x

131ms

149ms

179ms

NU
HDW-164

32.20x

18.17x

42.53x

N/A*

N/A*

N/A*

NEC
ND-3540A

30.76x

18.02x

40.08x

132ms

128ms

213ms

BenQ
DW1640

31.36x

17.47x

41.46x

105ms

116ms

250ms

Pioneer
DVR-110D

24.96x

14.60x

33.01x

105ms

119ms

195ms

The Pioneer DVR-110D proved fairly slow at reading CD-RW’s. The seek times however, are quite good.

* Some drives including the NU HDW-164 will simply execute the seek command without actually moving the pickup.

Audio ‘“ Digital Audio Extraction:

To test the digital audio extraction performance of the Pioneer DVR-110D, again we used Nero CD/DVD-Speed to measure the transfer rate. The audio disc we used is slightly larger than the disc used for the other tests, to be exact it’s was 78 minutes in length (78:53:31).

The Pioneer CDR-110D went beyond its maximum rated speed of 40x and actually reached 42.38x; let us compare the result with other drives:

Audio
Discs

Average 
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

Philips
ED16DVDR

37.40x

21.06x

49.59x

117ms

127ms

204ms

Aopen
DUW1608/ARR

37.50x

21.38x

49.72x

115ms

120ms

206ms

LG
GSA-4163B

31.37x

17.57x

41.39x

95ms

121ms

211ms

Lite-On
SHOW-1653S

36.92x

21.36x

48.89x

126ms

157ms

234ms

LG
GSA-5160D

31.27x

16.81x

41.20x

118ms

124ms

115ms

ASUS
DRW-1604P

31.10x

19.91x

41.38x

125ms

146ms

286ms

Samsung
TS-E552U

37.53x

19.73x

49.76x

85ms

97ms

171ms

Philips
DVDR16LS

31.44x

17.75x

41.69x

107ms

124ms

176ms

NU
HDW-164

32.98x

18.32x

43.70x

N/A*

N/A*

N/A*

NEC
ND-3540A

31.43x

18.00x

40.16x

119ms

135ms

217ms

BenQ
DW1640

37.15x

20.94x

49.23x

171ms

200ms

184ms

Pioneer
DVR-110D

31.52x

17.95x

42.38x

108ms

124ms

201ms

The Pioneer DVR-110D performed around average on the Audio-CD.

* Some drives including the NU HDW-164 will simply execute the seek command without actually moving the pickup.

For this test we used EAC (Exact Audio Copy) to test the drives Audio extraction performance. As we can see from the screenshot below the drive supports ‘caching” which can have an adverse effect on Audio extraction performance. Also worth noting, the drive does not support ‘C2 error info” with EAC. 

Below is the results produced by EAC:

 Burst mode

 Secure mode

The drive performed well in burst mode but performed poorly in secure mode.

Advanced audio ‘“ DAE quality test:

Before we move on to testing DVD read speeds, we will take a last audio test, and this time we used the ‘Advanced DAE Quality Test” feature in CD-Speed. For this test we used a CD-R media from RICOH (Thanks to RICOH Europe (BV) for sending us this media).

The extracting quality is excellent but the drive proved to slow for ‘on the fly copying” beyond 4x. Also reading of lead-in and lead-out were also not supported.

DVD reading performance:


Again, we will use Nero CD-Speed to measure the reading performance, this time for various types of DVD discs. The drive should read pressed single layer DVD-discs at 16X.

DVD ‘“ DVD-Video:

For our DVD reading performance tests we are going to start with a single and Double Layered DVD video discs. While only 1X speed is required to watch DVD movies, it’s useful to be able to read the discs at higher speeds if you’re going to extract (rip) the content of the disc to your hard drive.


DVD-Video Single Layer

 
DVD-Video Double Layer

The DVR-110D is not RIPLOCKED and reads a pressed DVD-Video at up to 16x for a Single Layer disc, and at up to 13x for a Double Layer disc. This makes the DVR-110D a fast DVD-Video ripper.

Now let us test a pressed DVD-ROM disc. For this test we used the Plextor PX-716 install DVD, which is around 4.37 Gigabyte in size.

The DVR-110D will reach 16x on DVD-ROM’s.

DVD
Video

Average 
Read
Speed
(SL)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(SL)

End
 Read 
Speed
(SL)

Average 
Read
Speed
(DL)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(DL)

End
 Read 
Speed
(DL)

Philips
ED16DVDR

9.62x

6.77x

6.52x

6.19x

3.45x

8.22x

AOpen
DUW1608/ARR

12.04x

6.71x

16.05x

6.61x

3.68x

8.79x

LG
GSA-4163B

7.62x

4.26x

10.16x

6.16x

3.44x

8.18x

Lite-On
SHOW-1653S

11.96x

6.77x

15.94x

6.15x

3.46x

8.19x

LG
GSA-5160D

7.60x

4.12x

10.13x

6.14x

3.38x

8.16x

ASUS
DRW-1604P

3.92x

2.17x

5.25x

3.94x

2.19x

5.25x

Samsung
TS-E552U

11.50x

6.78x

13.11x

6.41x

3.57x

8.51x

Philips
DVDR16LS

11.97x

6.61x

15.97x

6.02x

3.35x

8.01x

NU
HDW-164

6.40x

3.54x

8.53x

5.87x

3.26x

7.81x

NEC
ND-3540A

5.94x

3.32x

7.93x

5.45x

3.03x

7.24x

BenQ
DW1640

11.86x

6.59x

15.79x

9.01x

5.03x

12.00x

Pioneer
DVR-110D

11.98x

6.42x

15.98x

9.34x

5.26x

12.41x

The Pioneer DVR-110D performed very well with our DVD-Video tests. It was among the fastest drives at reading a pressed SL DVD-Video disc. And the fastest drive at reading a DL pressed DVD-Video disc.

DVD ‘“ DVD+R:


For this test we used a Maxell (Taiyo Yuden) 4X DVD+R and a Verbatim 8X DVD+RW with about 4.4Gb of data. Below are the results:


DVD+R

 
DVD+RW

DVD+R
DVD+RW

Average 
Read
Speed
(+R)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(+R)

End
 Read 
Speed
(+R)

Average 
Read
Speed
(+RW)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(+RW)

End
 Read 
Speed
(+RW)

AOpen
DUW1608/ARR

8.79x

4.83x

11.73x

5.83x

3.20x

7.79x

LG
GSA-4163B

7.69x

4.25x

10.29x

6.15x

3.41x

8.22x

Lite-On
SHOW-1653S

6.19x

3.42x

8.28x

6.23x

3.46x

8.33x

LG
GSA-5160D

7.66x

4.11x

10.23x

6.15x

3.32x

8.21x

ASUS
DRW-1604P

9.35x

5.19x

12.52x

6.26x

3.48x

8.36x

Samsung
TS-E522U

6.23x

3.44x

8.32x

6.22x

3.43x

8.31x

Philips
DVDR16LS

6.24x

3.42x

8.34x

6.24x

3.42x

8.34x

NU
DHW-164

6.47x

3.53x

8.63x

6.46x

3.52x

8.65x

NEC
ND-3540A

11.99x

6.56x

16.05x

9.87x

5.45x

13.18x

BenQ
DW1640

12.10x

6.59x

16.22x

9.37x

5.12x

12.56x

Pioneer
DVR-110D

9.35x

5.16x

12.46x

6.24x

3.44x

8.33x

The Pioneer DVR-110D performed averagely on DVD+R and DVD+RW, returning respectable results. Now let us see how it will perform on DVD-R/RW.

DVD ‘“ DVD-R/RW:


For this test we used a DAXON 16X DVD-R disc and a Verbatim 6X DVD-RW disc filled with about 4.4Gb of data. Our test results are found below:


DVD-R

 
DVD-RW

There are minor differences compared to reading the DVD+R/RW discs, but they are very marginal differences.

DVD-R
DVD-RW

Average 
Read
Speed
(-R)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(-R)

End
 Read 
Speed
(-R)

Average 
Read
Speed
(-RW)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(-RW)

End
 Read 
Speed
(-RW)

Philips
ED16DVDR

6.10x

3.39x

8.16x

6.11x

3.39x

8.17x

Aopen
DUW1608/ARR

8.80x

4.83x

11.76x

5.88x

3.23x

7.84x

LG
GSA-4163B

7.68x

4.26x

10.26x

6.16x

3.41x

8.23x

Lite-On
SHOW-1653S

6.05x

3.34x

8.09x

6.05x

3.35x

8.09x

LG
GSA-5160D

7.67x

4.12x

10.25x

6.14x

3.31x

8.21x

ASUS
DRW-1604P

9.37x

5.22x

12.52x

6.25x

3.46x

8.35x

Samsung
TS-E522U

6.19x

3.41x

8.27x

6.22x

3.43x

8.32x

Philips
DVDR16LS

6.23x

3.40x

8.33x

6.24x

3.41x

8.34x

NU
DHW-164

6.46x

3.49x

8.66x

6.46x

3.49x

8.64x

NEC
ND-3540A

12.01x

6.58x

16.06x

9.85x

5.42x

13.16x

BenQ
DW1640

12.09x

6.59x

16.17x

9.34x

5.11x

12.50x

Pioneer
DVR-110D

9.36x

5.18x

12.51x

6.24x

3.46x

8.34x

Once again the Pioneer DVR-110D was average at reading DVD-R/RW.

DVD-RAM


For this test we used a Emgeton 3x DVD-RAM disc, and below is our result:

The Pioneer DVR-110D reads DVD-RAM media at 2x, and read our test disc without problems.

Overall thoughts:

The Pioneer DVR-110D is a respectable reader, it’s not the fastest reader in the world, but during our read tests it proved reliable. Pressed DL DVD-Video read speeds were very impressive and it does have the advantage of being able to read DVD-RAM media.

Overall the reading performance of the Pioneer DVR-110D should not disappoint the end user.

But now it’s time to head on to a more interesting part: Writing CD-R and CD-RW discs…


26 Comments

lui_gough
Posts: 1253
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 09:47
Fix the spelling -> RICOH JNP? it's JPN! Overburning -> not that it doesn't overburn CD-R, its that it cannot overburn past 89mins.
_chef_
Posts: 29852
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 10:03
I'd say it needs to be clarified what's called overburning on what rated media...
lordyu
Posts: 265
Posted on: 08 Oct 05 23:30
For (much) better quality and (much) smaller file size, use PNG for screenshots or screen captures. JPG/JPEG is for photos.
[edited by lordyu on 08.10.2005 23:31]
eddiechi
Posts: 4
Posted on: 12 Dec 05 17:44
What is the difference between this review and the one done on Pioneer DVR-110 DVD on 02 December 2005... anything besides the firmware? The updated firmware seems to make this a much better unit comparing the two reviews....
digit010
Posts: 35
Posted on: 08 Nov 06 04:43
:r This software once had one of the best reputations as the leading software for burning.I used to use it myself for ALL my burning needs.Since it has become bloated,slower and many have encountered bugs that appear in near enough all new releases,it is no longer what I and I'm sure many others would recommend to use.There are now other burning tools available for free that make Nero look much less appealing.
Kiltedwolf
Posts: 1
Posted on: 17 Dec 06 00:45
This piece of "bloatware" has been the standard and still is as far as burning is concerned. There are lots of copy software out there, but having been using this software and others for about 8 years now, there are none finer as long as you're not looking to copy protected content. If that's what you're trying to do, then of course you're going to use something else! This program does have lighter versions if you don't want all the "bloat". The core program is still as stellar as ever. I applaud Ahead branching out and creating very useful other programs. As somebody who works in digital media, I can tell you that when you need to do some editing and you don't have a decent pay editor, it can come in quite handy! Nero is still my "baby" when it comes to disk burning!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 22 Jul 07 10:59
It used to be da $hit! too many bugs, and loaded with junk software. try imgburn for isos, and freeware for data. nero u suck!
Ms.Dusty
Posts: 4
Posted on: 11 Feb 08 17:21
I like and will keep the 7 but, I have to agree, the new Nero has lost alot of it's ease Good thing with rebates the Nero 8 I bought comes out to cost me $0.00
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 23 Feb 08 21:43
Nero 7 was bundled with my new CD/DVD burner. It is almost certainly the worst s/w I have encountered in 20 years. I am amazed that they can even give it away.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 14 Jul 08 16:05
meh it does basics
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 17 Jul 08 09:48
hahah tang ina nyo..! mga hayup kau...!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 27 Aug 08 14:35
In their quest to become bigger and better, Ahead has shot themselves in the foot. Once *the* burning software to have, it is now nothing but crap filled with useless additives that do nothing but slow it down and ruin itself. The post from Kiltedwolf cracks me up. There's always someone out there willing to point the finger at someone else accusing them of pirating or cheating. Truth be told, that dipshit probably works for Ahead. Anyway, if you want something that will slow your rig down, confuse you with extra junk that's not needed, and pretty pricey then get the latest Nero.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 02 Sep 08 16:06
:d :+ very bad
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 05 Sep 08 18:33
www.forexoptical.com
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Oct 08 14:23
can i delete the files from cd,in nero 8.0
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 09 Oct 08 20:07
peah this is a bullshit.it is to slow and also slowing down computer performance
mrwul
Posts: 13
Posted on: 01 Nov 08 17:59
why is it then - in reviews they rank up as best... ? frankly, for me, a top of the bill burner is sufficient, i donot need all the extra's .. but then again, as said, they rank up as one of the best..
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 13 Nov 08 11:41
Nero is crap. I have burnt one successful data cd out of 35 attempts.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 23 Nov 08 11:29
the latest release took me about 45 minutes to install with a couple of restarts in between!!! WTF!!! installing XP takes that much time!!!
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 25 Nov 08 21:42
Nero 7 Is a joke. Won't even go higher based on these posts! Thank you! Bought a new Samsung external dvd burner & Nero Tru-Ware just plain sucks!! Craps out at the end but it took an hour to get their. What a waste of time :r :c
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 03 Dec 08 02:51
How do I COMPLETELY remove every last trace of this horrific software from my computer? The trial version SUCKED and has left behind many files that seem irremovable. Please help!!!
firestormbringer
Posts: 1
Posted on: 06 Dec 08 20:05
On its own - Nero is so-so, but use it with DVD Shrink 3.2 and it sings ! :d
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 08 Dec 08 23:09
nero killed my burning and virtual devices and to make it worse, i couldnt uninstall it. it trashed my p.c no amount of reg cleaning or fixes or uninstalling all the burning helped nor did a repair install, dont want to be rude but thanks for nothing the software that came with my dvd shouldnt kill my p.c.. :c :c !!!
totalz
Posts: 299
Posted on: 10 Dec 08 06:04
After installing, 12 more system restore sections... :r
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 20 Dec 08 00:01
I looked for a free upgrade of old Nero 6.0.+ v., and started from Nero-8. in the 1-st install shield screen was displayed as Trial version. So I continued with 7.0. There I not found ANY mention about kind of version, it proposed to uninstall an old v. (which had a critical crash bug!), but finally appeared a title "Trial version" ... Boorish! I finished with Nero.
guest
Posts: 15284
Posted on: 02 Jan 09 10:27
:d :r ke nn funziona .nrg

Post a comment

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.