It has become clear that simply conducting endless benchmarks on SSD drives is pointless. Real users may run a few benchmarks when they first fit their SSD drive, but most users just want a drive that performs well in the real world. They want their drive to work "out of the box" and work fast and smoothly.
Most of the latest SSD drives can deliver very fast sustained reading and writing speeds, but these alone tell you very little about how the drive will perform in the real world.
If you intend to use your SSD as your primary system drive, with an operating system and applications installed and running from the drive, real world performance becomes much more important than just fast sequential read and write speeds, in this case I felt that it was time to move into a different method of testing.
From now on I will only use the log files from the Event Viewer to measure the start-up and shutdown of the system, and also use filecopy to measure all my copy tests from a RAM disk to the selected storage drive that I will be testing. For these tests I will also enable all power savings features that are available, since I believe that this is the way that the majority of the users will have them set on their PC.
Real world copy tests
I will now conduct some real world copy tests so that you can have a much better view of how the drive will perform. In these simple tests I try to simulate what a real user does with their drives. I will be copying some mp3 files, various picture and MKV files, and finishing by installing MS Office 2007.
As I said earlier from now on all my test files will be stored in a RAM disk and copied/pasted to the destination drive using filecopy. The filecopy utility will be used from now on for all my tests, and I’ll be using it this way to measure the time that it takes to copy the files.
Before I move on to the test, I want to give you an idea on how fast your RAM is. Below you can find the results.
As we can clearly see speed isn’t going to be an issue in these tests.
Read write tests – 259 MP3 song files (1.36GB total)
I will start this set of tests by copying 259 MP3 files from the RAM disk to the destination SSD and also from the SSD to the RAM disk.
An outstanding result.
Read write tests – 3,377 JPEG picture files (2.56GB total)
Continuing my set of tests, and this time I will be copying 2.54GB of pictures that are stored in the RAM disk to the currently testing SSD and vice versa.
The read result is again outstanding, but the write result isn’t as high as I would have hoped for.
Read write tests – 1 MKV and 1 SRT file (3.46GB)
Copying a movie is very common task for all of us, and in this test there are two files that will be copied from the RAM disk to the SSD and again from the SSD to the RAM disk.
Again both results are outstanding.
Read write tests – ISO (7927MB)
For this test, I copied ISO of the 'Iron Man' movie from the RAMDisk to the SSD and vice versa.
Again in this ISO test the HyperX Predator continues to deliver outstanding results.
Read write tests – Small files (533MB)
I have decided to adapt the very small files test that I am using as part of my USB3 flash tests, so this time I will be also copying all the files from the RAM disk to the SSD, and again from the SSD to the RAM disk.
Here we see that the HyperX Predator isn’t that impressive with small files, and this test verifies this.
Windows start-up based on the Boot Racer 5.00
On the next screen shot you can compare the current tested SSD and compare it to other drives that I have tested. Below I present the results.
The boot time is clearly impressive, 23 seconds to boot into the OS.
Installing applications is possibly something you don't do that often. But should you replace your system disk, then you will most likely have to re-install your applications. Most of the SSD drives I have tested up until now are quite slow at installing applications, most likely because their I/O performance was quite limited.
For these tests, we picked some popular applications and copied the entire contents of the CD or DVD media to the RAM disk. We did this to make sure that the reading speed of our CD/DVD reader would not hamper the performance of the target drive.
We then installed these applications onto our comparison HDD drives, which were all running mirror image installations of our Windows 10 64-bit installation, and timed the amount of time taken to install the application with a stopwatch on each of the drives.
MS Office 2007 Enterprise (full install)
Now let’s see how the HyperX Predator 480GB SSD performs with the installation of MS Office 2007 Enterprise Edition.
The procedure followed was very simple. I copied all the files from the CD to the RAM disk and used the virtual drive as a source for the installation files.
101 seconds is the best result that I have seen so far.
Speed degradation after heavy testing
On this page I will measure how the SSD performs after heavy testing and usage.
I will run an AS SSD benchmark test when the OS is freshly installed so that we can get a good view of how the drive performs with the OS. After that I will fill the drive up to 50% of its capacity, use the drive for a few days, and then re-run the AS SSD benchmark. The same procedure will be followed once again, but this time the drive will be filled close to 90% or higher of its capacity. To finish this test, I will simply delete all the extra data and leave the PC idle for a few hours so that the controller has the time to perform any necessary cleaning, then see how the drive performs.
In this picture you can see the test files that I will be copying to fill the drive with data, as you can see files vary from 8GB ISOs to very small text files.
In the picture below you will find all the applications that were installed for this test using Ninite, and I have also installed Microsoft Office 2007.
Now let’s start our tests.
Starting with the fresh install of Windows 10, and running AS SSD to get an idea of how the HyperX Predator performs, we can see that the score is close to the one that I got when the drive was connected as a spare. This result is very good especially as I always have all power saving features enabled for this test.
Even with little space the HyperX Predator SSD gives a very impressive result, however I would advise you not to have the drive working with this little space.
This time the drive is half empty, and the result is excellent.
With all the extra files deleted, and allowing it to run idle for a few minutes, the result is again excellent.
Testing the Predattor on an older system
A quick test on the HyperX Predator PCIe SSD on my old PC that has an Intel i5-750 CPU, a Gigabyte P55A-UD4 motherboard, 2x4GB of HyperX DDR3 RAM, an ATI 6670 GPU and a Corsair CX430 PSU.
Here is a quick list on the test system.
We can see that the HyperX Predator shows lower numbers in general but you need to remember that the drive was installed in a system that was built back in 2009, so the fact that the predator PCIe SSD can work in such an old system is a very pleasant surprise. Boot times were also very good, and with a clean install the drive needed less than 20 seconds to boot into the OS.
This concludes our review. To read the final thoughts and conclusion, click the link below....