Article index
Author
Final thoughts and the conclusion
Final thoughts and the conclusion
User experience
A modern operating system such as Windows 7 rarely does one thing at time; it processes hundreds of threads at once. Just take a look at the processes and services that are running in task manager for an idea of how much is going on, even with the PC idling at the desktop. When you start running applications on top of this, the workload increases in line with the number and type of applications you are running. It’s also fair to say that many of these processes are already loaded into system RAM, but many are also loaded into and unloaded from RAM from the system drive as and when they are required.
The fact of the matter is this. If you are running a mainstream or high end modern PC with a powerful CPU and graphics card, and are still running a traditional HDD as a system drive, regardless of how fast that HDD is, it is still bogging the system down substantially. It has long since passed the stage where one can meaningfully debate if an SSD is really faster than a traditional HDD. The fact is they are, and not just by a little bit: they are much faster.
If we look at the 4 basic requirements for a really fast SSD, they are as follows.
- Small file threaded performance needs to be high.
- Small random file performance needs to be high.
- Sequential read and write speeds needs to be high.
- Fast access times.
The OCZ Vertex 4 512GB SSD has all of the above attributes in abundance. The Indilinx Everest 2 is quite simply the most powerful SSD processor available at the moment, and there is nothing else that can really compete, not even the mighty SandForce SF-2281, which had been top dog for nearly a whole year.
Stability
I have only had the OCZ Vertex 4 SSD for a few days, so it’s not possible to comment on the drive’s long term reliability. But what I can tell you now is that during the testing period, the OCZ Vertex 4 has been 100% stable, with not a single issue to report.
The OCZ Vertex 4 is as “plug n play” as it gets. There are no special tweaks needed other than simply making sure that AHCI SATA mode is enabled in the system UEFI (BIOS) and installing the latest Intel RST SATA drivers if you want to get the best performance and compatibility out of this SSD.
Long term testing on the OCZ Vertex 4 begins now, and I will report back if I should encounter any reliability issues with the SSD.
Conclusion:
Let us summarise the most important positive and negative points below:
Positive:
- Silky smooth operation as a system drive.
- Excellent sequential reading and writing performance.
- Outstanding 4K random I/O performance at low and high queue depths.
- SATA 6Gbps support.
- TRIM support under Windows 7.
- Ultra fast access times.
- Completely silent operation.
- Fast operating system start-up and shutdown times.
- 5 years warranty.
Negative:
- Nothing to mention
To sum up, this is what I would say:
Throughout this review, the OCZ Vertex 4 has gone head to head with the best of the rest, and that includes SSDs such as the Intel 520, the Crucial M4, Plextor PX-256M3, and OCZ’s own Vertex 3. In all but a couple of instances the Vertex 4 has been by far the best performer, and in some cases has been an absolute country mile ahead of the rest. Its ability to produce breathtaking performance at very low queue depths, and those ultra fast access times mean that the OCZ Vertex 4 is by far the fastest SATA SSD we have ever tested here at MyCE.com.
A new performance bar has been set for consumer grade SSDs, and the OCZ Vertex 4 is now the drive to beat.
The five year warranty is also a welcome addition and shows that OCZ are confident about the reliability of the Vertex 4, which also brings the OCZ Vertex 4 in line with the Intel 520, and the Plextor M3, who also offer a five warranty.
Price
As I write this article, the OCZ Vertex 4 range of SSDs is not available in the shops, but they should be appearing soon. The prices in the table below for the Vertex 4 are the suggested prices. Prices in Euro and UK pounds are derived from the current US dollar exchange rates.
|
Model |
User capacity |
Price |
Cost per GB |
|
OCZ Vertex 4 512GB |
476GB |
£437 |
£0.92 |
|
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
238GB |
£218 |
£0.92 |
|
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB |
119GB |
£112 |
£0.94 |
|
Intel 520 series 240GB |
223GB |
£405.77 |
£1.69 |
|
Crucial M4 256GB |
238GB |
£239.10 |
£1.00 |
|
Plextor PX-256M3 256GB |
238GB |
£284.70 |
£1.20 |
|
OCZ Octane 512GB |
477GB |
£609 |
£1.27 |
|
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB |
223GB |
£248.69 |
£1.11 |
The parting sentence is
“The OCZ Vertex 4 512GB is an outstanding SSD; it has breathtaking performance, and is backed by a 5 year warranty”.


You may comment on this review below.
Thanks to:
|
|
EFD Software for providing the fully licensed versions of HD Tune Pro |
|
|
Alex Schepeljanski for AS SSD Benchmark |
|
|
25 Comments on OCZ Vertex 4 SSD review
|
This is the best review on the internet and yes I do read them all. This is what you call an in depth review by someone who konw what they are doing. This drive is ground breaking in the technology it uses. If you buy any other SSD you are in the past. Congrats Wendy, this is an example of hard work and understanding the technology.
|

The amount of effort that Wendy puts into these reviews is phenomenal and I know that as I see the length of time taken to produce them behind the scenes.
This is exactly the sort of thing that brings people here as you'll not get technically adept reviews of this sort of calibre anywhere else, and I'm not just saying that.
Superlative job Wendy!


Wombler
Seems like Indilinx weren't so much choking on Sandforces dust & exhaust, but delayed while mounting the jet engine to their jalopy

It seems like SSD's are finally living up to what they've been claiming from the inception

All that has developed from those slow as molasses compact flash cards
Absolutely OUTSTANDING job of testing and reporting in a way that most will understand-eh!

Thank You
I did not expect anything to leap that far ahead of the SandForce 2 based SSDs with SATA3 already becoming a bottleneck, but this clearly shows there was plenty of room for improvement even over SATA3. I also saw OCZ's YouTube videos showing saved game loads against the Vertex 3 and was surprised to see yet another improvement with just everyday usage instead of improvements that would only be seen with a busy enterprise server.
It's also exciting to see AS SSD break the 1000 mark, not to mention 1100 in your review, plus no degradation with incompressible data or heavy use.
OCZ working again with Indilinx on major products is sort of unexpected. I am running two OCZ Vertex 3 120GB drives and one OCZ Agility 3 120GB drives on this SBE system. The Dell laptop left to this system has an Agility 3 60GB. After reading these Indilinx-based OCZ drive reviews, I'm going to replace those with Octane and Vertex 4. Here are a few results.

For comparison, Amazon UK has it for £195 (~US$306)
|
In Italy (as usual) is even worst
![]() |
It just got cheaper, now it has a 10.00 rebate and its only 199.99
<TABLE class=product><TBODY><TR><TD class=priceBlockLabel>List Price:</TD><TD><STRIKE>$279.99</STRIKE></TD></TR><TR id=actualPriceRow><TD id=actualPriceLabel class=priceBlockLabelPrice>Price:</TD><TD id=actualPriceContent>$209.99 http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/image...192552839_.gif </TD></TR><TR style="DISPLAY: none" id=dealPriceRow><TD id=dealPriceLabel class=priceBlockLabel>Deal Price: </TD><TD id=dealPriceContent></TD></TR><TR id=youSaveRow class=youSavePriceRow><TD id=youSaveLabel class=priceBlockLabel>You Save:</TD><TD id=youSaveContent class=price>$70.00 (25%) </TD></TR><TR><TD class=priceBlockLabel>Post-purchase rebate:</TD><TD class=price>$10.00 Get forms </TD></TR><TR><TD class=priceBlockLabel>Price after rebate:</TD><TD class=price>$199.99</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Or about $140-150 for the 128.
The agility 4 can be obtained about $30/unit cheaper than the vertex 4 ... but with a 25% performance hit ... I wonder whether it would really be the market of anything but the tightest customer.
|
Can buy them here in Oz at about $230-240 for a 256GB model.
Or about $140-150 for the 128. The agility 4 can be obtained about $30/unit cheaper than the vertex 4 ... but with a 25% performance hit ... I wonder whether it would really be the market of anything but the tightest customer. |
|
Which 25%? I have no Vertex 4/Agility 4, but have used some Vertex 2/Agility 2 and Vertex 3/Agility 3.
|
Agility4 -> Linky
At the 256MB size for V4 : A4 respectively,
Sequential reads: 560 : 420 MB/s
Sequential writes: 510 : 410 MB/s
Random 4K read ops: 90,000 : 48,000 /s
Random 4K write ops: 85,000 : 85,000 /s
Basically, the vertex 4 has a performance drop of about 25% sequential read, 20% sequential write, 47% for random 4K read ops - random write ops remains the same (apparently).
Also, the ECC correction performance is better on the V4 compared to the A4.
They've deliberately crippled the Agility 4 to make it a budget product, and possibly not to anger the Vertex 3 customers.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00..._ya_os_product
Newegg HAD a sale on this drive today, but it was sold out shortly after I finished checking out with it
I don't know what the Amazon shipping is, but the newegg shipping was free,
Cryin' shame I was buying the drive for my neighbor's computer.
|
I hope it is as good as Dee's review suggests
Newegg HAD a sale on this drive today, but it was sold out shortly after I finished checking out with it I don't know what the Amazon shipping is, but the newegg shipping was free, Cryin' shame I was buying the drive for my neighbor's computer. |
And I'll be damned if I make a special trip, I usually only go to the
closest Staples because it's in the same strip mall as my second
favorite Chinese buffet and sushi bar
Just ran a clean install after setting ACHI mode and the full install of Windows7 64bit ran to desktop in 16min47sec
I'm impressed.
But again, a pity this is a customer machine
I have noticed in the ratings by users the Ms always got higher ratings by a significant margin, though some in this forum favor the Intel version.
Thought that it was the same assembly line anyway Micron/Intel share?
I was wondering why people prefer the Non M version, though it appears at NewEgg and Amazon the M version gets much better reviews.
In any case it appears that at this very moment Vertex 4 and Vector are only separated by $35 dollars @ Amazon contrary to earlier in the year ($465 versus $499). I only paid $429 for the Vertex 4 in Mid December, and the Pre Jan price for Vector was close to $600.
Thus many would probably choose the Vector unless the vertex drops down to more like $400.
In any case I am quite happy with my Vertex 4.
Latest Comments
Hot Threads
- jadburner, last post: jadburner 158
- WeeHappyPixie, last post: Wombler 4
- Dee, last post: Liggy 66
- jadburner, last post: fitsch 35
- DoMiN8ToR, last post: gremromchello 6931




