Anvil’s Storage Utilities
As well as performing SSD endurance tests.
Anvil’s Storage Utilities has a very nice SSD benchmarking application. The SSD
benchmark tests many different aspects of SSD performance, including 4K random
at different queue depths, and also sequential performance, but more importantly
than this, all using real test data.
Another very nice feature of Anvil’s SSD
benchmark is the fact that you can change the compression levels of the test
data. The compression levels of the data sets used for the tests can be varied
from 0% compression right up to 100% compressed data, and there are even a few
data profiles already included, such as database (8%) compression, and also an
application profile (46%) compression, which is designed to simulate real
application data being read and written to the SSD.
Anvil’s Storage Utilities is still in beta
at the moment, but the application is currently solid enough to use in this
article, and I have already verified the results obtained using an SATA
I will include a screenshot of the review
drive, and all comparison results will be presented in the form of graphs. If
you would like to see screenshots of the test results obtained on the other
SSDs in this article, you can do so by following the link here.
I will also be testing three different
compression profiles, which are as follows.
- 0 fill (100% compressible data)
- Application simulation profile (46%
- 100% (non compressible data)
So let’s begin the tests.
Crucial MX300 2TB SSD (0 fill)
are ranked by highest total score.
A very good result for the Crucial MX300 2TB
Crucial MX300 2TB SSD (application profile)
Results are ranked by highest total score.
Another very good result for the Crucial
MX300 2TB SSD.
Crucial MX300 2TB SSD (100% incompressible)
Results are based on the highest total score.
For the final test the result is again very
The Crucial MX300 2TB SSD was able to deliver
very good performance in all three tests.
Now let’s head to the next page for some
real world tests….